<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Good Practices Quick-Reference Sheet</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75854/22619657/Good_Practices_Quick-Reference_Sheet</link><description>I was thinking about the nature of LFR events, and realized that there are at least two unique elements that radically differentiate a LFR game from a standard game -- first, you never know who or what is going to show up to the table; second, you ca</description><item><title>I disagree with this. The PC that makes no rolls is every bit as subject to the bonuses or penalties that accrue based on success or failure in the skill challenge as the PC that does all the rolling. Rolling a skill check in a skill challenge is usu</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75854/22619657/Good_Practices_Quick-Reference_Sheet?post_id=410832118#410832118</link><description>I disagree with this. The PC that makes no rolls is every bit as subject to the bonuses or penalties that accrue based on success or failure in the skill challenge as the PC that does all the rolling. Rolling a skill check in a skill challenge is usu</description><pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 14:19:13 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I disagree. A player who is sitting at the table reading a book while the rest play in an encounter is not, imo, participating.I have to say I don't care much about xp - I think anyone who feels entitled to xp in any situation is overthinking things.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75854/22619657/Good_Practices_Quick-Reference_Sheet?post_id=399934669#399934669</link><description>I disagree. A player who is sitting at the table reading a book while the rest play in an encounter is not, imo, participating.I have to say I don't care much about xp - I think anyone who feels entitled to xp in any situation is overthinking things.</description><pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 15:18:03 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Person is at table and their character is alive, they are taking part period. Otherwise you get into the really old school rules from some games where you didn't XP for a combat if you didn't have an effect in the combat (I.E always missed, etc).Actu</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75854/22619657/Good_Practices_Quick-Reference_Sheet?post_id=399931397#399931397</link><description>Person is at table and their character is alive, they are taking part period. Otherwise you get into the really old school rules from some games where you didn't XP for a combat if you didn't have an effect in the combat (I.E always missed, etc).Actu</description><pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 14:47:28 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Oh, c'mon.&Acirc;&nbsp; They'd have to hold a major convention in the middle of the summer in an incredibly humid city and then force gamers to walk -- outside! -- from event to ev...Right.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75854/22619657/Good_Practices_Quick-Reference_Sheet?post_id=399685621#399685621</link><description>Oh, c'mon.&Acirc;&nbsp; They'd have to hold a major convention in the middle of the summer in an incredibly humid city and then force gamers to walk -- outside! -- from event to ev...Right.</description><pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 10:27:03 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>If only we were kidding about this...</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75854/22619657/Good_Practices_Quick-Reference_Sheet?post_id=399681909#399681909</link><description>If only we were kidding about this...</description><pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 09:32:26 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
