<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Dragonmarks...</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75854/22584565/Dragonmarks...</link><description>So I've been wondering, why are dragonmarks not allowed in RPGA/LFR games?It seems like almost everything else is allowed, so why close the door on such a small thing?Personally, I know my cleric would *love* to take Mark of Healing, as its a very po</description><item><title>At least that we could pass off as Plaguechanged.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75854/22584565/Dragonmarks...?post_id=398244533#398244533</link><description>At least that we could pass off as Plaguechanged.</description><pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 16:16:32 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>. . . .or Gamma World!(Draw from the mutation deck at the start of every adventure! Wheeeee!)&Acirc;&nbsp;</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75854/22584565/Dragonmarks...?post_id=398214841#398214841</link><description>. . . .or Gamma World!(Draw from the mutation deck at the start of every adventure! Wheeeee!)&Acirc;&nbsp;</description><pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 11:23:45 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>I wouldn't count on it.&Acirc;&nbsp; If it were going to happen, I would have expected it *last* year, when WotC's focus was on Eberron (and, when such a card would have provided an incentive for LFR players to purchase then-current Eberron books).With WotC's f</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75854/22584565/Dragonmarks...?post_id=397970497#397970497</link><description>I wouldn't count on it.&Acirc;&nbsp; If it were going to happen, I would have expected it *last* year, when WotC's focus was on Eberron (and, when such a card would have provided an incentive for LFR players to purchase then-current Eberron books).With WotC's f</description><pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 12:15:50 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>I sort-of hate that idea.&Acirc;&nbsp; On one hand, those cards are goofy-powerful for four hour games, and removing one of them from the character's playable stack to allow for a goofy-powerful feat isn't a terrible compromise.On the other hand, flying thunder</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75854/22584565/Dragonmarks...?post_id=397967845#397967845</link><description>I sort-of hate that idea.&Acirc;&nbsp; On one hand, those cards are goofy-powerful for four hour games, and removing one of them from the character's playable stack to allow for a goofy-powerful feat isn't a terrible compromise.On the other hand, flying thunder</description><pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 11:45:24 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>I expect there will soon be a reward card that lets you play one.That would be an amazing compromise.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75854/22584565/Dragonmarks...?post_id=397964173#397964173</link><description>I expect there will soon be a reward card that lets you play one.That would be an amazing compromise.</description><pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 10:59:52 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
