<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Create RPGA legal characters at any level with CCG2.0</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75854/22441625/Create_RPGA_legal_characters_at_any_level_with_CCG2.0</link><description>First off, this is entirely hearsay as I head it from a group member last night.But he says he has heard a rumor that the 2.0 revision will allow you to create a character at any level to play in an RPGA mod. I certainly hope not.My simple analysis:P</description><item><title>It happened. Reasonably restricted 5th, 8th and 11th lvl characters. They will be weaker, but they still didn't earn it.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75854/22441625/Create_RPGA_legal_characters_at_any_level_with_CCG2.0?post_id=450583573#450583573</link><description>It happened. Reasonably restricted 5th, 8th and 11th lvl characters. They will be weaker, but they still didn't earn it.</description><pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 12:31:58 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>From experience, the difference between 1 and 4, and between 7 and 10 seem very noticeable. 1-4 is obvious: Twice the number of non-at-will powers, three times the number of feats, stat bump, 50% more hits. Assuming you take one of myriad of ways to</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75854/22441625/Create_RPGA_legal_characters_at_any_level_with_CCG2.0?post_id=400195501#400195501</link><description>From experience, the difference between 1 and 4, and between 7 and 10 seem very noticeable. 1-4 is obvious: Twice the number of non-at-will powers, three times the number of feats, stat bump, 50% more hits. Assuming you take one of myriad of ways to</description><pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 07:46:35 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Oh come on, it's not that big a deal.If you put a level-7 and a level-10 at the same table, then the level-10 has two extra powers that will most likely come into play only once, and slightly higher but not noticeably different attack and defense sco</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75854/22441625/Create_RPGA_legal_characters_at_any_level_with_CCG2.0?post_id=399892897#399892897</link><description>Oh come on, it's not that big a deal.If you put a level-7 and a level-10 at the same table, then the level-10 has two extra powers that will most likely come into play only once, and slightly higher but not noticeably different attack and defense sco</description><pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 04:55:59 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Which is, of course, why no one has proposed allowing that.As I recall, the specific proposal made in this thread was that players must be within one or two levels of the 'appropriate' level (with some adjustment for low and high tier).&Acirc;&nbsp; For example</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75854/22441625/Create_RPGA_legal_characters_at_any_level_with_CCG2.0?post_id=399887801#399887801</link><description>Which is, of course, why no one has proposed allowing that.As I recall, the specific proposal made in this thread was that players must be within one or two levels of the 'appropriate' level (with some adjustment for low and high tier).&Acirc;&nbsp; For example</description><pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 02:19:30 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I think it may make sense to stretch the current APL system to be a little more inclusive if everyone at the table agrees to it, but there should be some limit. A character a single level below the target range can probably still contribute and have</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75854/22441625/Create_RPGA_legal_characters_at_any_level_with_CCG2.0?post_id=399458617#399458617</link><description>I think it may make sense to stretch the current APL system to be a little more inclusive if everyone at the table agrees to it, but there should be some limit. A character a single level below the target range can probably still contribute and have</description><pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 13:03:11 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
