<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Dhampyr legal in LFR ?</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75854/19396082/Dhampyr_legal_in_LFR_</link><description>One of my players wants to retrain one of his feats for the Vampiric Heritage feat. Is this legal in LFR (as soon as this dragon issue is compiled) ?</description><item><title>yay!</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75854/19396082/Dhampyr_legal_in_LFR_?post_id=329829998#329829998</link><description>yay!</description><pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 22:50:34 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Seeing as how WotC owns Forgotten Realms, I'd think they have a little more say what is or isn't in the lore than you do. Regardless, this thread has long since drifted from it's original purpose, and is degrading into "uh-huh!" versus "nuh-uh!"As s</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75854/19396082/Dhampyr_legal_in_LFR_?post_id=329829990#329829990</link><description>Seeing as how WotC owns Forgotten Realms, I'd think they have a little more say what is or isn't in the lore than you do. Regardless, this thread has long since drifted from it's original purpose, and is degrading into "uh-huh!" versus "nuh-uh!"As s</description><pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 22:40:11 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>"Balk at Balkan folklore". Heh. And don't forget the Yakuza. They're in the Realms, too. As for adding Dhampyr in, so what? How many countless races are in the Realms, and how many of them have been added in over the years? An accurate count would b</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75854/19396082/Dhampyr_legal_in_LFR_?post_id=329829986#329829986</link><description>"Balk at Balkan folklore". Heh. And don't forget the Yakuza. They're in the Realms, too. As for adding Dhampyr in, so what? How many countless races are in the Realms, and how many of them have been added in over the years? An accurate count would b</description><pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 19:46:18 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>This is the LFR forum you are trying to argue in. LFR rules state that certain things published in Dragon are legal. Dhampyr are one of those. Hence, in LFR they must now become part of the lore. You just refuse to accept it because you have a pe</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75854/19396082/Dhampyr_legal_in_LFR_?post_id=329829978#329829978</link><description>This is the LFR forum you are trying to argue in. LFR rules state that certain things published in Dragon are legal. Dhampyr are one of those. Hence, in LFR they must now become part of the lore. You just refuse to accept it because you have a pe</description><pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 17:50:23 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>ElJeffeX,They are *not* part of FR lore. The Dragon Article in question was not part of FR canon. If we go by your logic, then Vecna becomes part of FR canon. Vecna is NOT FR Canon, no matter what WoTC or Dragon magazone says.The problem is that with</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75854/19396082/Dhampyr_legal_in_LFR_?post_id=329829970#329829970</link><description>ElJeffeX,They are *not* part of FR lore. The Dragon Article in question was not part of FR canon. If we go by your logic, then Vecna becomes part of FR canon. Vecna is NOT FR Canon, no matter what WoTC or Dragon magazone says.The problem is that with</description><pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 16:58:16 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
