<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Biggest Clear Cut Rules Mistakes Compendium</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75854/19396078/Biggest_Clear_Cut_Rules_Mistakes_Compendium</link><description>This is intended to be a list of things people have seen characters do that are flat out wrong without any gray areas. Feel free to post additional items and I'll edit the following posts appropriately.List of Resources:D&amp;D Updates - what used to be</description><item><title>Very common error I have seen is when Dazed characters (or less often, stunned characters) ask to delay.You cannot delay when you are dazed or unable to take actions. (PH 288)</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75854/19396078/Biggest_Clear_Cut_Rules_Mistakes_Compendium?post_id=329829790#329829790</link><description>Very common error I have seen is when Dazed characters (or less often, stunned characters) ask to delay.You cannot delay when you are dazed or unable to take actions. (PH 288)</description><pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 03:49:24 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>DMs are told to "Use passive checks in the situations...", to avoid 'Gotcha' situations, and to make it clear how their enemies are doing.Yes, it doesn't come right out and say that you should or should not identify minions, but it is not clear cut h</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75854/19396078/Biggest_Clear_Cut_Rules_Mistakes_Compendium?post_id=329829718#329829718</link><description>DMs are told to "Use passive checks in the situations...", to avoid 'Gotcha' situations, and to make it clear how their enemies are doing.Yes, it doesn't come right out and say that you should or should not identify minions, but it is not clear cut h</description><pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 09:30:04 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>RAI? I beleive you are letting a bit of bias sneak in here. There are many of your 'clear cut' examples where one could argue RAI. That is irrelevant to the actual rules in this case. For example, the warlock's curse being able to be used by other wa</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75854/19396078/Biggest_Clear_Cut_Rules_Mistakes_Compendium?post_id=329829710#329829710</link><description>RAI? I beleive you are letting a bit of bias sneak in here. There are many of your 'clear cut' examples where one could argue RAI. That is irrelevant to the actual rules in this case. For example, the warlock's curse being able to be used by other wa</description><pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 07:51:09 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Not clear cut. Clear cut should be clear not just in RAW, but RAI as well. A reasonable DM can easily allow PCs to identify who are minions via a passive monster check. I don't see many players arguing with the DM on this one.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75854/19396078/Biggest_Clear_Cut_Rules_Mistakes_Compendium?post_id=329829706#329829706</link><description>Not clear cut. Clear cut should be clear not just in RAW, but RAI as well. A reasonable DM can easily allow PCs to identify who are minions via a passive monster check. I don't see many players arguing with the DM on this one.</description><pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 07:39:08 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Fighters and marking:Any attack by a fighter, whether it hits or misses, and whether it is melee or ranged, can mark its target.Something I had missed, originally.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75854/19396078/Biggest_Clear_Cut_Rules_Mistakes_Compendium?post_id=329829690#329829690</link><description>Fighters and marking:Any attack by a fighter, whether it hits or misses, and whether it is melee or ranged, can mark its target.Something I had missed, originally.</description><pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 04:17:21 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
