<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: 2011 Community Cup Format Discussion: Unified Modern</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75846/27652321/2011_Community_Cup_Format_Discussion:_Unified_Modern</link><description>The 2011 Community Cup formats have been announced! Check out the article here. Use this thread to discuss your thoughts on the Modern format being used this year! Please do not discuss strategy as there is already a thread for that located here.The</description><item><title>1) No:RT @mtgaaron: "Eternal" is a ratings category that includes Vintage and Legacy. It  doesn't mean anything, including "nonrotating." I don't like the word.2) EDH cards not legal in Modern:RT @mtgaaron:Commander cards are legal in Vintage/Legacy</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75846/27652321/2011_Community_Cup_Format_Discussion:_Unified_Modern?post_id=505569459#505569459</link><description>1) No:RT @mtgaaron: "Eternal" is a ratings category that includes Vintage and Legacy. It  doesn't mean anything, including "nonrotating." I don't like the word.2) EDH cards not legal in Modern:RT @mtgaaron:Commander cards are legal in Vintage/Legacy</description><pubDate>Sat, 20 Aug 2011 17:55:33 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I have a few questions about Modern now:1. Is it actually an "Eternal" format? I know that Legacy and Vintage were the only two that are listed under the "Eternal" catagory, has this changed officialy?2. If Modern is an Eternal format, weren't all th</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75846/27652321/2011_Community_Cup_Format_Discussion:_Unified_Modern?post_id=505569219#505569219</link><description>I have a few questions about Modern now:1. Is it actually an "Eternal" format? I know that Legacy and Vintage were the only two that are listed under the "Eternal" catagory, has this changed officialy?2. If Modern is an Eternal format, weren't all th</description><pubDate>Sat, 20 Aug 2011 17:47:26 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Even when it was in standard, the burning bridges deck was never better than a 2nd tier deck. Nowhere near ban-worthy unless someone finds a way to break it with the expanded card pool.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75846/27652321/2011_Community_Cup_Format_Discussion:_Unified_Modern?post_id=499308977#499308977</link><description>Even when it was in standard, the burning bridges deck was never better than a 2nd tier deck. Nowhere near ban-worthy unless someone finds a way to break it with the expanded card pool.</description><pubDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2011 23:10:11 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>None of the decks at the Community Cup ran Ensnaring Bridge, though.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75846/27652321/2011_Community_Cup_Format_Discussion:_Unified_Modern?post_id=499205037#499205037</link><description>None of the decks at the Community Cup ran Ensnaring Bridge, though.</description><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 18:42:42 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I'd also like to mention a worthy condender of a card to be looked at for restriction or banning in modern, Ensnaring Bridge. This card would single handedly destroy Aggro being priced at 3 unless it packed some serious anti-artifact hate, especially</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75846/27652321/2011_Community_Cup_Format_Discussion:_Unified_Modern?post_id=499162589#499162589</link><description>I'd also like to mention a worthy condender of a card to be looked at for restriction or banning in modern, Ensnaring Bridge. This card would single handedly destroy Aggro being priced at 3 unless it packed some serious anti-artifact hate, especially</description><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 10:30:46 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
