<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Does Persist/Undying preserve the state of the creature?</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29783663/Does_PersistUndying_preserve_the_state_of_the_creature</link><description>I ran into this situation while playing some kitchen table Magic with my buddy. He's running a pretty mean Evolve deck that, for giggles, also includes     Cauldron of Souls                                 for protecting his creatures, and he insists</description><item><title>Note, that even if you cast a spell/use an ability to remove the creature cards from the graveyard, persist and undying have already triggered and will resolve doing as much as possible, which just ends up to be nothing. But they are still on the sta</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29783663/Does_PersistUndying_preserve_the_state_of_the_creature?post_id=529279753#529279753</link><description>Note, that even if you cast a spell/use an ability to remove the creature cards from the graveyard, persist and undying have already triggered and will resolve doing as much as possible, which just ends up to be nothing. But they are still on the sta</description><pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2013 04:33:36 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>He is probably thinking of regenerate.If a creature was regenerated, it never died. It was kept alive by the effect.But as was already pointed out, both persist and undying trigger after the creature died (and went the graveyard) so you could respond</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29783663/Does_PersistUndying_preserve_the_state_of_the_creature?post_id=529276157#529276157</link><description>He is probably thinking of regenerate.If a creature was regenerated, it never died. It was kept alive by the effect.But as was already pointed out, both persist and undying trigger after the creature died (and went the graveyard) so you could respond</description><pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 22:14:46 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>You are correct, he is incorrect.Persist (When this creature dies, if it had no -1/-1 counters on it, return it to the battlefield under its owner's control with a -1/-1 counter on it.)Undying (When this creature dies, if it had no +1/+1 counters on</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29783663/Does_PersistUndying_preserve_the_state_of_the_creature?post_id=529275617#529275617</link><description>You are correct, he is incorrect.Persist (When this creature dies, if it had no -1/-1 counters on it, return it to the battlefield under its owner's control with a -1/-1 counter on it.)Undying (When this creature dies, if it had no +1/+1 counters on</description><pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 21:19:22 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Now that I'm thinking about it, I may have misunderstood his logic. Now, I think he believes that the creatures don't actually hit the graveyard. Which is wrong, because you can exile them with something like     Tormod's Crypt</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29783663/Does_PersistUndying_preserve_the_state_of_the_creature?post_id=529275099#529275099</link><description>Now that I'm thinking about it, I may have misunderstood his logic. Now, I think he believes that the creatures don't actually hit the graveyard. Which is wrong, because you can exile them with something like     Tormod's Crypt</description><pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 20:37:03 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>and if your friend arguesthen ask him "what is the point of the second ability on     Skullbriar, the Walking Grave                                ?" obviously, he must be mistaken</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29783663/Does_PersistUndying_preserve_the_state_of_the_creature?post_id=529274913#529274913</link><description>and if your friend arguesthen ask him "what is the point of the second ability on     Skullbriar, the Walking Grave                                ?" obviously, he must be mistaken</description><pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 20:28:19 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
