New Posts For Thread: They Wasted A Perfectly Good Name, Round 2; Eaten by Spidershttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29756691/They_Wasted_A_Perfectly_Good_Name,_Round_2;_Eaten_by_SpidersRound 1: Touch of the Eternal , won by Chaos LightRound 2: Eaten by Spiders Sorry folks, I planned to do a new thread for each iteration of this so it would be easier to track andVOTING IS OVERThe winner, with 3 votes, is 3-7-15-1-292http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29756691/They_Wasted_A_Perfectly_Good_Name,_Round_2;_Eaten_by_Spiders?post_id=528816431#528816431VOTING IS OVERThe winner, with 3 votes, is 3-7-15-1-292Wed, 06 Feb 2013 13:49:53 -0600I generally don't design cards to compete with the power level of rares/mythics, particularly in regards to any specific format, unless I'm creating cards that would -be- rares/mythics.[/quote]Well, I'm a bit proponent of powerful cards at all raritihttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29756691/They_Wasted_A_Perfectly_Good_Name,_Round_2;_Eaten_by_Spiders?post_id=528793981#528793981I generally don't design cards to compete with the power level of rares/mythics, particularly in regards to any specific format, unless I'm creating cards that would -be- rares/mythics.[/quote]Well, I'm a bit proponent of powerful cards at all raritiTue, 05 Feb 2013 16:23:57 -0600I generally don't design cards to compete with the power level of rares/mythics, particularly in regards to any specific format, unless I'm creating cards that would -be- rares/mythics.http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29756691/They_Wasted_A_Perfectly_Good_Name,_Round_2;_Eaten_by_Spiders?post_id=528793377#528793377I generally don't design cards to compete with the power level of rares/mythics, particularly in regards to any specific format, unless I'm creating cards that would -be- rares/mythics.Tue, 05 Feb 2013 16:02:44 -0600Maybe not -jank-, but certainly not well costed. I should've made it a little cheaper. Not sure why I didn't.[/quote]Just compare it to recent standard cards like Jace, Stoneforge Mystic and Snapcaster Mage!Well, okay, jank was a slight exaggeratiohttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29756691/They_Wasted_A_Perfectly_Good_Name,_Round_2;_Eaten_by_Spiders?post_id=528793027#528793027Maybe not -jank-, but certainly not well costed. I should've made it a little cheaper. Not sure why I didn't.[/quote]Just compare it to recent standard cards like Jace, Stoneforge Mystic and Snapcaster Mage!Well, okay, jank was a slight exaggeratioTue, 05 Feb 2013 15:50:58 -0600Maybe not -jank-, but certainly not well costed. I should've made it a little cheaper. Not sure why I didn't.http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29756691/They_Wasted_A_Perfectly_Good_Name,_Round_2;_Eaten_by_Spiders?post_id=528792801#528792801Maybe not -jank-, but certainly not well costed. I should've made it a little cheaper. Not sure why I didn't.Tue, 05 Feb 2013 15:43:31 -0600