<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: 704.5h</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29753209/704.5h</link><description>Enchanted Evening                                    Opalescence                                    Concordant Crossroads                                    Mirrorweave                                Am I right in figuring that only the permanent tha</description><item><title>As far as I know, it's been possible for a permanent to gain the World supertype since at least 1999.      Opalescence                                 +     Vesuvan Doppelganger                                 +     Concordant Crossroads</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29753209/704.5h?post_id=528648517#528648517</link><description>As far as I know, it's been possible for a permanent to gain the World supertype since at least 1999.      Opalescence                                 +     Vesuvan Doppelganger                                 +     Concordant Crossroads</description><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 15:07:11 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>The rule was created a long time ago, when there was no possibility for a permanent to gain the World supertype: it concerned itself only with World cards entering the Battlefield and pushing out older Worlds. As such, ONLY Timestamp mattered. I see</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29753209/704.5h?post_id=528647815#528647815</link><description>The rule was created a long time ago, when there was no possibility for a permanent to gain the World supertype: it concerned itself only with World cards entering the Battlefield and pushing out older Worlds. As such, ONLY Timestamp mattered. I see</description><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 14:44:29 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>lf you remove the characteristic modifier, you get something that doesn't care about characteristics. It does have that modifier, though.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29753209/704.5h?post_id=528647153#528647153</link><description>lf you remove the characteristic modifier, you get something that doesn't care about characteristics. It does have that modifier, though.</description><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 14:19:07 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>but the rule says we're talking about the permanent that had it the shortest amount of time, not the card that had it the shortest amount of time. Permanents only exist on the battlefield and the object isn't really related to the objects elsewhere t</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29753209/704.5h?post_id=528646567#528646567</link><description>but the rule says we're talking about the permanent that had it the shortest amount of time, not the card that had it the shortest amount of time. Permanents only exist on the battlefield and the object isn't really related to the objects elsewhere t</description><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 13:58:50 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>The problem is, under normal enchant-world circumstances, the card had the world supertype even before it entered the battlefield.  It had the world supertype in your deck, and it had the world supertype in your hand.  That is most likely why they ad</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29753209/704.5h?post_id=528645549#528645549</link><description>The problem is, under normal enchant-world circumstances, the card had the world supertype even before it entered the battlefield.  It had the world supertype in your deck, and it had the world supertype in your hand.  That is most likely why they ad</description><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 13:29:31 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
