<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: 2/4/2013 MM: "Designing for Boros"</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29752235/242013_MM:_Designing_for_Boros</link><description>This thread is for discussion of this week's Making Magic, which goes live Monday morning on magicthegathering.com.</description><item><title>Blue is far less about order than White. Oh, don't get me wrong, Blue's rational worldview mixes well with coordinated thought. But Blue is not about order, is not about stasis, is not about lack of motion, is not about hierarchy, is not about law, i</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29752235/242013_MM:_Designing_for_Boros?post_id=529219797#529219797</link><description>Blue is far less about order than White. Oh, don't get me wrong, Blue's rational worldview mixes well with coordinated thought. But Blue is not about order, is not about stasis, is not about lack of motion, is not about hierarchy, is not about law, i</description><pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 06:28:37 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Well, I argued about 'order' in another thread.Order - as a word - means 'giving things a (fixed) place'. So a room is considered orderly, if all pieces are at the 'right' place. In mathematics, an 'ordered' set fulfills certain criteria, f.e. that y</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29752235/242013_MM:_Designing_for_Boros?post_id=529212483#529212483</link><description>Well, I argued about 'order' in another thread.Order - as a word - means 'giving things a (fixed) place'. So a room is considered orderly, if all pieces are at the 'right' place. In mathematics, an 'ordered' set fulfills certain criteria, f.e. that y</description><pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 20:17:59 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>...................................................Where can I find these people? I want to watch them say these things. (Popcorn would probably be involved.)</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29752235/242013_MM:_Designing_for_Boros?post_id=529155445#529155445</link><description>...................................................Where can I find these people? I want to watch them say these things. (Popcorn would probably be involved.)</description><pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 21:33:06 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>...</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29752235/242013_MM:_Designing_for_Boros?post_id=529150281#529150281</link><description>...</description><pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 16:43:01 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>I agree with prety much everything you just said, but you do seem like you've never seen a color pie argument before, because you expect them to be sane and rational. I've never seen a color pie argument that didn't consist almost entirely of, to par</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29752235/242013_MM:_Designing_for_Boros?post_id=529149959#529149959</link><description>I agree with prety much everything you just said, but you do seem like you've never seen a color pie argument before, because you expect them to be sane and rational. I've never seen a color pie argument that didn't consist almost entirely of, to par</description><pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 16:35:09 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
