<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Card: Change of Plans</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29752195/Card:_Change_of_Plans</link><description>Plans of Change     (3)(R)(R)(R)Instant---------------------------------------------------------Remove all attacking creatures from combat.You gain an additional combat phase next turn.---------------------------------------------------------The abil</description><item><title>I suppose you could use an untap clause if you'd prefer to keep it in red.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29752195/Card:_Change_of_Plans?post_id=528671255#528671255</link><description>I suppose you could use an untap clause if you'd prefer to keep it in red.</description><pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 11:35:05 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>I have been thinking about this a lot this day. I hadn't thought about hybrid thou.Looking at it I don't really want to go hybrid since it might make the cast too easy even though it is possible. I do think the addition of vigilance makes it a defini</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29752195/Card:_Change_of_Plans?post_id=528650195#528650195</link><description>I have been thinking about this a lot this day. I hadn't thought about hybrid thou.Looking at it I don't really want to go hybrid since it might make the cast too easy even though it is possible. I do think the addition of vigilance makes it a defini</description><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 16:05:58 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Extra combat                                 is secondary in white in that white is allowed to use it if it needs to, and     Tahngarth                                 got vigilance to enable his design, and     removing from combat&amp;nbsp;is white</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29752195/Card:_Change_of_Plans?post_id=528642545#528642545</link><description>Extra combat                                 is secondary in white in that white is allowed to use it if it needs to, and     Tahngarth                                 got vigilance to enable his design, and     removing from combat&amp;nbsp;is white</description><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 11:52:51 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Changing Tactics     (3)(W)(R)(R)Instant---------------------------------------------------------Remove all attacking creatures from combat.Creatures you control gain vigilance during your next turn. You gain an additional combat phase next turn.----</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29752195/Card:_Change_of_Plans?post_id=528631927#528631927</link><description>Changing Tactics     (3)(W)(R)(R)Instant---------------------------------------------------------Remove all attacking creatures from combat.Creatures you control gain vigilance during your next turn. You gain an additional combat phase next turn.----</description><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 04:57:18 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>I have been wresteling with that thought actually. More in the card wording to be precise. I think giving fvigilance next turn is better then using the untap wording because of errata. Double combat means nothing if you can't use it. Another way woul</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29752195/Card:_Change_of_Plans?post_id=528630151#528630151</link><description>I have been wresteling with that thought actually. More in the card wording to be precise. I think giving fvigilance next turn is better then using the untap wording because of errata. Double combat means nothing if you can't use it. Another way woul</description><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 02:24:49 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
