<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: [GTC-ICD] Furious Resistance</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29637549/GTC-ICD_Furious_Resistance</link><description>Furious Resistance                                 Instant (Common)Target blocking creature gets +3/+0 and gains first strike until end of turn."At least the Gateless rebels have ideals. Rakdos just mocks, defiles, and kills all we hold dear." - Libu</description><item><title>The flavour text is a BOROS soldier comparing the Gateless to the Rakdos. The art shows said soldier blowing away a Rakdos cultist of some sort.[/quote]There is absolutely no reason for a Boros soldier to refer to the Gateless in your context. This i</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29637549/GTC-ICD_Furious_Resistance?post_id=528287337#528287337</link><description>The flavour text is a BOROS soldier comparing the Gateless to the Rakdos. The art shows said soldier blowing away a Rakdos cultist of some sort.[/quote]There is absolutely no reason for a Boros soldier to refer to the Gateless in your context. This i</description><pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 12:49:14 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>I'd rather have     smite                                 in boros, and gruul probably doesn't need it (except against gruul, in which case watch out for bloodrush blowout).I'm waiting for the reverse smite card (destroy target blocking creature for</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29637549/GTC-ICD_Furious_Resistance?post_id=528286931#528286931</link><description>I'd rather have     smite                                 in boros, and gruul probably doesn't need it (except against gruul, in which case watch out for bloodrush blowout).I'm waiting for the reverse smite card (destroy target blocking creature for</description><pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 12:35:42 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>The flavour text is a BOROS soldier comparing the Gateless to the Rakdos. The art shows said soldier blowing away a Rakdos cultist of some sort.[/quote]There is absolutely no reason for a Boros soldier to refer to the Gateless in your context. This i</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29637549/GTC-ICD_Furious_Resistance?post_id=528286789#528286789</link><description>The flavour text is a BOROS soldier comparing the Gateless to the Rakdos. The art shows said soldier blowing away a Rakdos cultist of some sort.[/quote]There is absolutely no reason for a Boros soldier to refer to the Gateless in your context. This i</description><pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 12:30:55 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>The flavour text is a BOROS soldier comparing the Gateless to the Rakdos. The art shows said soldier blowing away a Rakdos cultist of some sort.[/quote]There is absolutely no reason for a Boros soldier to refer to the Gateless in your context. This i</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29637549/GTC-ICD_Furious_Resistance?post_id=528286743#528286743</link><description>The flavour text is a BOROS soldier comparing the Gateless to the Rakdos. The art shows said soldier blowing away a Rakdos cultist of some sort.[/quote]There is absolutely no reason for a Boros soldier to refer to the Gateless in your context. This i</description><pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 12:29:37 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>The flavour text is a BOROS soldier comparing the Gateless to the Rakdos. The art shows said soldier blowing away a Rakdos cultist of some sort.[/quote]There is absolutely no reason for a Boros soldier to refer to the Gateless in your context. This i</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29637549/GTC-ICD_Furious_Resistance?post_id=528286457#528286457</link><description>The flavour text is a BOROS soldier comparing the Gateless to the Rakdos. The art shows said soldier blowing away a Rakdos cultist of some sort.[/quote]There is absolutely no reason for a Boros soldier to refer to the Gateless in your context. This i</description><pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 12:19:48 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
