<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: New to magic. Need deck help</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29613639/New_to_magic._Need_deck_help</link><description>Hi all im new to magic. I got the deck builders toolkit (2013) and i made this deck:    Arbor Elf                                X2    Bond Beetle                                    Abundant Growth                                    Fog</description><item><title>^^ you are a poopy head :DThere! Burned!!! Oooooo!!!!Haha no I jest...lol</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29613639/New_to_magic._Need_deck_help?post_id=527790219#527790219</link><description>^^ you are a poopy head :DThere! Burned!!! Oooooo!!!!Haha no I jest...lol</description><pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2013 22:19:41 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>OK I promise this is the last one ;)I only felt ganged up on because there were 2 people on the opposite side of the debate from me.  Otherwise it was a fun and, thankfully very civil :)  I've seen internet debates get way more out of hand than this</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29613639/New_to_magic._Need_deck_help?post_id=527789833#527789833</link><description>OK I promise this is the last one ;)I only felt ganged up on because there were 2 people on the opposite side of the debate from me.  Otherwise it was a fun and, thankfully very civil :)  I've seen internet debates get way more out of hand than this</description><pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2013 21:43:18 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Lol we have. Sorry u feel Ganged up on. Just expressing different styles of play. Always good for learning</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29613639/New_to_magic._Need_deck_help?post_id=527789661#527789661</link><description>Lol we have. Sorry u feel Ganged up on. Just expressing different styles of play. Always good for learning</description><pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2013 21:30:49 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>it does.considering I don't play with sideboards I'm not an authority on the subject so I could be wrong there.  The argument still stands, though, that RDW has plenty of options when it coems to life gainand I definitely think its safer to assume a</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29613639/New_to_magic._Need_deck_help?post_id=527789237#527789237</link><description>it does.considering I don't play with sideboards I'm not an authority on the subject so I could be wrong there.  The argument still stands, though, that RDW has plenty of options when it coems to life gainand I definitely think its safer to assume a</description><pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2013 21:02:20 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>^^assumes it will resolve and connect. Not a safe assumption in the slightest. Having to rely on a creature for that effect is...not very reliable. I don't see why you think rawsugar's logic is flawed tho. His analysis is pretty much spot on. RDW doe</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29613639/New_to_magic._Need_deck_help?post_id=527788937#527788937</link><description>^^assumes it will resolve and connect. Not a safe assumption in the slightest. Having to rely on a creature for that effect is...not very reliable. I don't see why you think rawsugar's logic is flawed tho. His analysis is pretty much spot on. RDW doe</description><pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2013 20:36:35 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
