<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Wort, the Raidmother and Fling losing conspire after being cast</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29610047/Wort,_the_Raidmother_and_Fling_losing_conspire_after_being_cast</link><description>Question 15 from the latest Cranial Insertion article (link)Is there a way to change the rules to make conspire stick? Maybe a rule explaining that abilities from static abilities keep existing on the spell even if the static ability is gone?But then</description><item><title>It's kind of hard with all the kinds of replacement effects that can replace draws and the fact that the we don't know how draws would be replaced later on.If for example we'd try to disallow paying when there are not enogh cards to draw, it won't pr</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29610047/Wort,_the_Raidmother_and_Fling_losing_conspire_after_being_cast?post_id=527684607#527684607</link><description>It's kind of hard with all the kinds of replacement effects that can replace draws and the fact that the we don't know how draws would be replaced later on.If for example we'd try to disallow paying when there are not enogh cards to draw, it won't pr</description><pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2013 11:12:29 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Right, of course. Surely some resolution is possible?</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29610047/Wort,_the_Raidmother_and_Fling_losing_conspire_after_being_cast?post_id=527683147#527683147</link><description>Right, of course. Surely some resolution is possible?</description><pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2013 10:25:36 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>That would break the rule that makes you lose when you draw from an empty library, since impossible actions are ignored.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29610047/Wort,_the_Raidmother_and_Fling_losing_conspire_after_being_cast?post_id=527682827#527682827</link><description>That would break the rule that makes you lose when you draw from an empty library, since impossible actions are ignored.</description><pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2013 10:15:30 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>If "fixing" Psychic Vortex won't solve the issue, then I agree it shouldn't change. What I would like to see is an amendment to the rules that makes drawing off an empty library an impossible action.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29610047/Wort,_the_Raidmother_and_Fling_losing_conspire_after_being_cast?post_id=527682767#527682767</link><description>If "fixing" Psychic Vortex won't solve the issue, then I agree it shouldn't change. What I would like to see is an amendment to the rules that makes drawing off an empty library an impossible action.</description><pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2013 10:13:36 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>I don't understand why not, though. Aside from making the activation cost clean of unique actions, it sounds fine. I think this deserves further inquiry.[/quote]Okay, there's a thread about     Meditate                                 (link), and one</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29610047/Wort,_the_Raidmother_and_Fling_losing_conspire_after_being_cast?post_id=527680973#527680973</link><description>I don't understand why not, though. Aside from making the activation cost clean of unique actions, it sounds fine. I think this deserves further inquiry.[/quote]Okay, there's a thread about     Meditate                                 (link), and one</description><pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2013 09:10:03 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
