<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Revealing Cards intentionally</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29603153/Revealing_Cards_intentionally</link><description>Hi,My question is this: are you allowed to reveal cards in your hand? I am under the impression that you cannot. What is the penalty for revealing a card, and does it depend on the circumstances?In a recent draft (not for money), I had 4 lands and a</description><item><title>My perspective is this: if you didn't take any illegal game actions and if your opponent doesn't think you've taken any illegal game actions, even after the situation is clearly explained in more detail, you are fine. Mind games are okay, more than o</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29603153/Revealing_Cards_intentionally?post_id=527714687#527714687</link><description>My perspective is this: if you didn't take any illegal game actions and if your opponent doesn't think you've taken any illegal game actions, even after the situation is clearly explained in more detail, you are fine. Mind games are okay, more than o</description><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 12:15:14 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>"I was hoping to represent it correctly and hope my opponent leapt to an incorrect conclusion in a way that was not my fault."You're playing with words, here. Your goal is that your way of putting things is misleading enough to cause your opponent to</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29603153/Revealing_Cards_intentionally?post_id=527713569#527713569</link><description>"I was hoping to represent it correctly and hope my opponent leapt to an incorrect conclusion in a way that was not my fault."You're playing with words, here. Your goal is that your way of putting things is misleading enough to cause your opponent to</description><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 11:19:01 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>@PurpleFive: Initally I was arguing that I wasnt trying to misrepresent the game state, I was hoping to represent it correctly and hope my opponent leapt to an incorrect conclusion in a way that was not my fault. In the spellskite-kiki-jiki example,</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29603153/Revealing_Cards_intentionally?post_id=527710931#527710931</link><description>@PurpleFive: Initally I was arguing that I wasnt trying to misrepresent the game state, I was hoping to represent it correctly and hope my opponent leapt to an incorrect conclusion in a way that was not my fault. In the spellskite-kiki-jiki example,</description><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 09:29:23 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>@mr.physics:The answer you are looking for is subjective, and will vary from judge to judge. An objective answer does not exist -- especially on a forum, where the scenario is theoretical and certain details are missing (which is an important distinc</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29603153/Revealing_Cards_intentionally?post_id=527710537#527710537</link><description>@mr.physics:The answer you are looking for is subjective, and will vary from judge to judge. An objective answer does not exist -- especially on a forum, where the scenario is theoretical and certain details are missing (which is an important distinc</description><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 09:11:18 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>The issue here, mr.physics, is that you are making your actions unclear on purpose. You are expecting your opponent to assume you have the means to cast it when you do this action (be it that you have more lands than you actually have, or that the co</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29603153/Revealing_Cards_intentionally?post_id=527709469#527709469</link><description>The issue here, mr.physics, is that you are making your actions unclear on purpose. You are expecting your opponent to assume you have the means to cast it when you do this action (be it that you have more lands than you actually have, or that the co</description><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 08:29:56 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
