http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29597207/Dual_landsWill we always have dual lands in standard? I just got back into Magic, and I was thinking of how good the mana fixing is right now. I understand that in the past, they had the fetch lands, and the 'bounce' lands. Will those ever be reprinted? When Ghttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29597207/Dual_lands?post_id=527532431#527532431That Standard was horrible for a lot of reasons.Thu, 27 Dec 2012 16:10:57 -0600http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29597207/Dual_lands?post_id=527522605#527522605We don't need a lack of duals. Look no further than the Mirrodin-Champions Standard (with 8th Edtion) and you'll find some horrendous mana...it was miserable. Sure, it encouraged mono-color decks, but there's a better way. Cards that encourage the usThu, 27 Dec 2012 09:46:58 -0600http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29597207/Dual_lands?post_id=527512873#527512873Which we need more of in Modern. Which is all I'm really interested in currently.Wed, 26 Dec 2012 20:30:24 -0600http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29597207/Dual_lands?post_id=527497683#527497683they would certainly favor control and some midrange builds with a cycle like that.Wed, 26 Dec 2012 07:19:45 -0600http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29597207/Dual_lands?post_id=527492541#527492541If you mean Alpha duals, then that's pretty much what the Buddy-System Lands (or Zen Lands) are. Or Shock lands.I'd like to see some lands with 2 basic land types that gained the opponent life. [/quote]A grove of the burnwillows cycle would be techy.Tue, 25 Dec 2012 21:29:48 -0600