<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: New posters</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29521061/New_posters</link><description>Just throwing this out there to any of you posters new to the game or the forums:1.) it's the internet, get over it 2.) all advice isn't supposed to be taken as hate 3.) if people tell you to just play tier 1 deck X or Y, it's probably a hint.  Again</description><item><title>What B_F said. None of the modes are good enough by themselves to be considered worth running it as a 4 of.Most of the times you use the mode to counter stuff, you would have been better off with something like     Negate</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29521061/New_posters?post_id=526877707#526877707</link><description>What B_F said. None of the modes are good enough by themselves to be considered worth running it as a 4 of.Most of the times you use the mode to counter stuff, you would have been better off with something like     Negate</description><pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 17:05:55 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Explain.[/quote]you should not play 4 charms because the card isn't good enough to justify running enough.... i'm not going into a long winded explanation about why, there are a lot of articles out there explaning it.  it's ok as a 1 or 2 of because</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29521061/New_posters?post_id=526866941#526866941</link><description>Explain.[/quote]you should not play 4 charms because the card isn't good enough to justify running enough.... i'm not going into a long winded explanation about why, there are a lot of articles out there explaning it.  it's ok as a 1 or 2 of because</description><pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 10:47:46 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Explain.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29521061/New_posters?post_id=526865233#526865233</link><description>Explain.</description><pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 09:30:31 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>4 izzet charms is always too manyand yes, drownyard is most definitely better.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29521061/New_posters?post_id=526863085#526863085</link><description>4 izzet charms is always too manyand yes, drownyard is most definitely better.</description><pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 07:47:43 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>post a list somewhere and let's see what you've got. [/quote]So I made this list pre-electromancer advice, and I figure he's worth a try. Also I'd like another Olivia but sadly am lacking one. 1x     Swamp                                5x     Island</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29521061/New_posters?post_id=526850865#526850865</link><description>post a list somewhere and let's see what you've got. [/quote]So I made this list pre-electromancer advice, and I figure he's worth a try. Also I'd like another Olivia but sadly am lacking one. 1x     Swamp                                5x     Island</description><pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 15:39:34 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
