New Posts For Thread: Delversnipe deck discussion.http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29518983/Delversnipe_deck_discussion.I know plenty of others have tried/are trying to build a deck around guttersnipe. But there are so many little combinations and different paths you can take with the deck, and I'd really like to know what everyone else who has tested one of these decI'm going to chime in and say that I don't think Guttersnipe belongs in an aggressive deck. If you play him on curve, he's a turn 3 do-nothing that you are hoping to untap with. There are better aggressive plays. I really prefer him as a finisher inhttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29518983/Delversnipe_deck_discussion.?post_id=526594213#526594213I'm going to chime in and say that I don't think Guttersnipe belongs in an aggressive deck. If you play him on curve, he's a turn 3 do-nothing that you are hoping to untap with. There are better aggressive plays. I really prefer him as a finisher inTue, 04 Dec 2012 09:03:11 -06002 x charmbreaker devils could be helpful.http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29518983/Delversnipe_deck_discussion.?post_id=526589429#5265894292 x charmbreaker devils could be helpful.Tue, 04 Dec 2012 05:16:27 -0600I agree with you about those cards being pricey, hence their place in a deck running a set of a dude that can lower their cost. When Amass costs you 3 mana to draw 3 cards and deal 2 damage, it stops being over-priced.But we can debate specifics(thoshttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29518983/Delversnipe_deck_discussion.?post_id=526589251#526589251I agree with you about those cards being pricey, hence their place in a deck running a set of a dude that can lower their cost. When Amass costs you 3 mana to draw 3 cards and deal 2 damage, it stops being over-priced.But we can debate specifics(thosTue, 04 Dec 2012 05:06:44 -0600Having played with delver a lot recently, I have to say that it just isn't the house it once was. There is less quality deck thinning in this format so it's harder to flip delver or dig for one early.http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29518983/Delversnipe_deck_discussion.?post_id=526587645#526587645Having played with delver a lot recently, I have to say that it just isn't the house it once was. There is less quality deck thinning in this format so it's harder to flip delver or dig for one early.Tue, 04 Dec 2012 02:52:18 -0600I have to disagree with Av, in a tempo-oriented deck like this, getting a nice beater like delver down early is very important, and amass and thoughflare are both overcosted and slow in a deck like yours that wants to win ASAP.http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29518983/Delversnipe_deck_discussion.?post_id=526587491#526587491I have to disagree with Av, in a tempo-oriented deck like this, getting a nice beater like delver down early is very important, and amass and thoughflare are both overcosted and slow in a deck like yours that wants to win ASAP.Tue, 04 Dec 2012 02:37:23 -0600