New Posts For Thread: Mono Red Burnhttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29502289/Mono_Red_BurnStraightforward*EDIT*: This is apparently not burn, but RDW, just so we can get off that topicLand21 x Mountain Creatures4 x Grim Lavamancer 4 x Spark ElementalFire Servant is bad. Huge casting cost, small body, and just screams to be removed because if you untap with it, you'll almost always win if you have a few burn spells in hand.If you want a creature to care about what spells you have, think about Lahttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29502289/Mono_Red_Burn?post_id=526276785#526276785Fire Servant is bad. Huge casting cost, small body, and just screams to be removed because if you untap with it, you'll almost always win if you have a few burn spells in hand.If you want a creature to care about what spells you have, think about LaThu, 22 Nov 2012 07:17:17 -0600Fire Servant might be a creature to consider, the mana cost is a bit high but it will double the damage done by all of your instant and sorcery cards. Brimstone Volley could be an ophttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29502289/Mono_Red_Burn?post_id=526271217#526271217Fire Servant might be a creature to consider, the mana cost is a bit high but it will double the damage done by all of your instant and sorcery cards. Brimstone Volley could be an opWed, 21 Nov 2012 21:51:40 -0600Well..I guess my deck is not "Burn"I would not call it straight burn, but I still feel like it falls int that category. Also this deck is a budget. So no can do for Chain Lightning Anyways, i fixed the decklist arohttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29502289/Mono_Red_Burn?post_id=526270545#526270545Well..I guess my deck is not "Burn"I would not call it straight burn, but I still feel like it falls int that category. Also this deck is a budget. So no can do for Chain Lightning Anyways, i fixed the decklist aroWed, 21 Nov 2012 20:36:36 -0600Fanatic is good because he's a turn 1 play that will always deal at least 1 damage. He also improves Burn chances VS Bridge from Below .Incinerate isn't a must, that I'll agree to, but there are only so many 1 cmchttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29502289/Mono_Red_Burn?post_id=526231041#526231041Fanatic is good because he's a turn 1 play that will always deal at least 1 damage. He also improves Burn chances VS Bridge from Below .Incinerate isn't a must, that I'll agree to, but there are only so many 1 cmcTue, 20 Nov 2012 12:29:22 -0600im sorry but the only creatures that can be considered burn are those dealing a decent amount of damage when entering or leaving the field. stable/recurring sources of damage are nice, they are also easy to stop. direct damage on the other hand has mhttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29502289/Mono_Red_Burn?post_id=526230803#526230803im sorry but the only creatures that can be considered burn are those dealing a decent amount of damage when entering or leaving the field. stable/recurring sources of damage are nice, they are also easy to stop. direct damage on the other hand has mTue, 20 Nov 2012 12:20:47 -0600