New Posts For Thread: Gatecrash Discussionhttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29498647/Gatecrash_DiscussionSo, I normally wouldn't have made a thread like this before spoilers start (or just let someone else make it) but I just got a eyefull of some supposed spoilers on MTGS, and they look rather legit.So, I figured it was about time to start up a thread.Do they happen often enough in constructed to be worth it? (genuine question, by the way)[/quote]Depends on the matchup, and how the cards play out. Also confident there will be another 2 Midrange decks possible in the top tiers that will have very ghttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29498647/Gatecrash_Discussion?post_id=528555363#528555363Do they happen often enough in constructed to be worth it? (genuine question, by the way)[/quote]Depends on the matchup, and how the cards play out. Also confident there will be another 2 Midrange decks possible in the top tiers that will have very gMon, 28 Jan 2013 06:50:57 -0600Do they happen often enough in constructed to be worth it? (genuine question, by the way)http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29498647/Gatecrash_Discussion?post_id=528547069#528547069Do they happen often enough in constructed to be worth it? (genuine question, by the way)Sun, 27 Jan 2013 19:03:06 -0600Spotlight's sac ability is good for creature board stalls.http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29498647/Gatecrash_Discussion?post_id=528539141#528539141Spotlight's sac ability is good for creature board stalls.Sun, 27 Jan 2013 13:15:55 -0600I think this is wrong. If Glaring Spotlight were to be played, it would be as a sideboard against an auras deck. In this case, removing an enchanted creature with creature removal gets you a 2-for-1 or better. So spending a card to allow you to do thhttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29498647/Gatecrash_Discussion?post_id=528537437#528537437I think this is wrong. If Glaring Spotlight were to be played, it would be as a sideboard against an auras deck. In this case, removing an enchanted creature with creature removal gets you a 2-for-1 or better. So spending a card to allow you to do thSun, 27 Jan 2013 12:18:51 -0600I think this is wrong. If Glaring Spotlight were to be played, it would be as a sideboard against an auras deck. In this case, removing an enchanted creature with creature removal gets you a 2-for-1 or better. So spending a card to allow you to do thhttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29498647/Gatecrash_Discussion?post_id=528537307#528537307I think this is wrong. If Glaring Spotlight were to be played, it would be as a sideboard against an auras deck. In this case, removing an enchanted creature with creature removal gets you a 2-for-1 or better. So spending a card to allow you to do thSun, 27 Jan 2013 12:14:22 -0600