<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: A question about Reckless Waif</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29497511/A_question_about_Reckless_Waif</link><description>So I noticed in the latest Perilous Research column that mono-red decks are starting to play Reckless Waif in the main deck over Stromkirk Noble. For the life of me though, I can't figure out why this would be a good idea. As a sideboard, yes, phenom</description><item><title>Waif is an interesting card, but the most important consideration in playing it should come with if you are on the play or not. For this reason I think it's a fantastic replacement 1-drop for the sideboard- but it's usefulness in the maindeck strikes</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29497511/A_question_about_Reckless_Waif?post_id=526829029#526829029</link><description>Waif is an interesting card, but the most important consideration in playing it should come with if you are on the play or not. For this reason I think it's a fantastic replacement 1-drop for the sideboard- but it's usefulness in the maindeck strikes</description><pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 19:06:57 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>I play RDW occasionally and have Reckless waif in the main. Reason being, if I am not playing humans it is a better 1 drop for me. At some point either I will have 2 in play and skip playing a car on 4th turn to turn them or my opponent will have a l</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29497511/A_question_about_Reckless_Waif?post_id=526775731#526775731</link><description>I play RDW occasionally and have Reckless waif in the main. Reason being, if I am not playing humans it is a better 1 drop for me. At some point either I will have 2 in play and skip playing a car on 4th turn to turn them or my opponent will have a l</description><pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 16:50:26 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>probably has to do with the online metagame in which less and less aggro decks (or decks with turn 1 players) exist, making it far more likely to flip right away coupled with the fact that stromkirk gets outclassed often by things like augur of bolas</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29497511/A_question_about_Reckless_Waif?post_id=526122445#526122445</link><description>probably has to do with the online metagame in which less and less aggro decks (or decks with turn 1 players) exist, making it far more likely to flip right away coupled with the fact that stromkirk gets outclassed often by things like augur of bolas</description><pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 12:51:44 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>So I noticed in the latest Perilous Research column that mono-red decks are starting to play Reckless Waif in the main deck over Stromkirk Noble. For the life of me though, I can't figure out why this would be a good idea. As a sideboard, yes, phenom</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29497511/A_question_about_Reckless_Waif?post_id=526122227#526122227</link><description>So I noticed in the latest Perilous Research column that mono-red decks are starting to play Reckless Waif in the main deck over Stromkirk Noble. For the life of me though, I can't figure out why this would be a good idea. As a sideboard, yes, phenom</description><pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 12:44:43 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
