<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: 11/16/2012 LD: "Spell Check"</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29496255/11162012_LD:_Spell_Check</link><description>This thread is for discussion of this week's Latest Developments, which goes live Friday morning on magicthegathering.com.</description><item><title>Heh, yeah, I'd be so up for that. :) Failing that, more articles like this would be great.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29496255/11162012_LD:_Spell_Check?post_id=526198935#526198935</link><description>Heh, yeah, I'd be so up for that. :) Failing that, more articles like this would be great.</description><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2012 09:34:54 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>I love these articles. Seriously, I would be fine with one week of nothing but Multiverse entries and stories about what cards used to be like.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29496255/11162012_LD:_Spell_Check?post_id=526122429#526122429</link><description>I love these articles. Seriously, I would be fine with one week of nothing but Multiverse entries and stories about what cards used to be like.</description><pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 12:51:35 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Yeah, but the marginal benefit of a 'destroy all lands' spell would not have been worth having one exception to the "all of mine" or "All of theirs" thing on Overload.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29496255/11162012_LD:_Spell_Check?post_id=526118999#526118999</link><description>Yeah, but the marginal benefit of a 'destroy all lands' spell would not have been worth having one exception to the "all of mine" or "All of theirs" thing on Overload.</description><pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 10:52:29 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>I don't recall     boom//bust                                 ripping up the tournament scene. They could (putting to one side the decision to have overload not be symmetrical) have made the following and I suspect would not have spoiled the environm</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29496255/11162012_LD:_Spell_Check?post_id=526113587#526113587</link><description>I don't recall     boom//bust                                 ripping up the tournament scene. They could (putting to one side the decision to have overload not be symmetrical) have made the following and I suspect would not have spoiled the environm</description><pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 07:16:19 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>My guess about their take on mass LD versus Cyclonic Rift effects:- It's a lot harder to come back from a destroyed mana base.- Being able to have your resources available means you have the chance* for an out for what's coming your way (because you</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29496255/11162012_LD:_Spell_Check?post_id=526108523#526108523</link><description>My guess about their take on mass LD versus Cyclonic Rift effects:- It's a lot harder to come back from a destroyed mana base.- Being able to have your resources available means you have the chance* for an out for what's coming your way (because you</description><pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 00:37:27 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
