New Posts For Thread: 10/19/2012 LD: "Guilds Divided"http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29445405/10192012_LD:_Guilds_DividedThis thread is for discussion of this week's Latest Developments, which goes live Friday morning on magicthegathering.com.I have only played RTR Limited a few times. Two of those times I used Izzet (once at prerelease, once in a draft) and won the whole thing both times. It's not that hard to find a few cheap creatures and a few flying creatures to make a deck with dynahttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29445405/10192012_LD:_Guilds_Divided?post_id=525293851#525293851I have only played RTR Limited a few times. Two of those times I used Izzet (once at prerelease, once in a draft) and won the whole thing both times. It's not that hard to find a few cheap creatures and a few flying creatures to make a deck with dynaSat, 20 Oct 2012 12:40:22 -0500Dedicated Izzet just seems to have to be so lucky. If you don't open the right cards I imagine it'll be quite hard to beat even medicore versions of the other guilds. The ranking so far seems:1. All non-izzet guilds (they do seem pretty well balancedhttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29445405/10192012_LD:_Guilds_Divided?post_id=525257337#525257337Dedicated Izzet just seems to have to be so lucky. If you don't open the right cards I imagine it'll be quite hard to beat even medicore versions of the other guilds. The ranking so far seems:1. All non-izzet guilds (they do seem pretty well balancedFri, 19 Oct 2012 11:09:28 -0500"Waaah! Less one sided wins for me, instead of fun engaging matches, you suck wizards!" hehehe you're funny :DAlthough considering how few people actually visit this site, especially the less experienced, I'm sure you have nothing to worry about :P[/http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29445405/10192012_LD:_Guilds_Divided?post_id=525255867#525255867"Waaah! Less one sided wins for me, instead of fun engaging matches, you suck wizards!" hehehe you're funny :DAlthough considering how few people actually visit this site, especially the less experienced, I'm sure you have nothing to worry about :P[/Fri, 19 Oct 2012 10:15:57 -0500Wait, R&D expected the color pair that gets the fewest creatures to be the swarm deck? Seriously?Man, Izzet is such a disaster in this set.http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29445405/10192012_LD:_Guilds_Divided?post_id=525250323#525250323Wait, R&D expected the color pair that gets the fewest creatures to be the swarm deck? Seriously?Man, Izzet is such a disaster in this set.Fri, 19 Oct 2012 06:16:11 -0500I wouldn't worry too much. The format's already old enough on MtGO that anyone who's actually been drafting the set knows all of this already.Besides, I venture to suggest that at least two of the ten main alleged archetypes discussed aren't actuallyhttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29445405/10192012_LD:_Guilds_Divided?post_id=525248821#525248821I wouldn't worry too much. The format's already old enough on MtGO that anyone who's actually been drafting the set knows all of this already.Besides, I venture to suggest that at least two of the ten main alleged archetypes discussed aren't actuallyFri, 19 Oct 2012 04:23:47 -0500