<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Welcome to Pangaea- A Prehistory Set</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29419937/Welcome_to_Pangaea-_A_Prehistory_Set</link><description>As a fan of Prehistoric creatures, I have noticed that there are barely any Magic cards that fall into the category of being "Prehisoric". There are maybe two dinosaur cards and several Mammoth cards from over ten years ago. However, what if there wa</description><item><title>One, it's Neanderthal. Two, this mechanic doesn't work. You could say "exile a copy of this card from your hand" but not "attach". Creatures cannot be attached.Mammoths aren't dinosaurs, and that card's either     Craw Wurm</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29419937/Welcome_to_Pangaea-_A_Prehistory_Set?post_id=524901301#524901301</link><description>One, it's Neanderthal. Two, this mechanic doesn't work. You could say "exile a copy of this card from your hand" but not "attach". Creatures cannot be attached.Mammoths aren't dinosaurs, and that card's either     Craw Wurm</description><pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2012 16:33:50 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I wonder if there was one highly imaginative dinosaur that actually considered that. Probably not.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29419937/Welcome_to_Pangaea-_A_Prehistory_Set?post_id=524899925#524899925</link><description>I wonder if there was one highly imaginative dinosaur that actually considered that. Probably not.</description><pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2012 15:50:03 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Personally I think you should scrap Carnivore and bring back Devour. It already exists and fills the same place flavourfully, letting you focus on the other mechnics.Tar PitsLandTar pits comes into play tapped.:t:: Add :b: to your mana pool.:B::B::T:</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29419937/Welcome_to_Pangaea-_A_Prehistory_Set?post_id=524899589#524899589</link><description>Personally I think you should scrap Carnivore and bring back Devour. It already exists and fills the same place flavourfully, letting you focus on the other mechnics.Tar PitsLandTar pits comes into play tapped.:t:: Add :b: to your mana pool.:B::B::T:</description><pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2012 15:39:08 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Also, I actually like Mown's original Carnivore. It's reminiscent of     Birthing Pod                                 except reverse, and without the tutoring. I know he said he wasn't fond of it, but I would probably play one or two creatures with t</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29419937/Welcome_to_Pangaea-_A_Prehistory_Set?post_id=524898447#524898447</link><description>Also, I actually like Mown's original Carnivore. It's reminiscent of     Birthing Pod                                 except reverse, and without the tutoring. I know he said he wasn't fond of it, but I would probably play one or two creatures with t</description><pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2012 15:06:01 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I would word carnivore as:Carnivore (You may sacrifice a creature with converted mana cost one less than this creature's rather than pay this creature's mana cost) That means you reveal it, and pay its cost (or sacrifice) as you cast it. Nice and sim</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29419937/Welcome_to_Pangaea-_A_Prehistory_Set?post_id=524890609#524890609</link><description>I would word carnivore as:Carnivore (You may sacrifice a creature with converted mana cost one less than this creature's rather than pay this creature's mana cost) That means you reveal it, and pay its cost (or sacrifice) as you cast it. Nice and sim</description><pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2012 11:35:04 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
