<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: 8/13/2012 MM: "Numbers on a White Board"</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29305061/8132012_MM:_Numbers_on_a_White_Board</link><description>This thread is for discussion of this week's Making Magic, which goes live Monday morning on magicthegathering.com.</description><item><title>I don't much care about tournaments either, but the early history does interest me. I started around Revised, fell away completely around Exodus (hello, irony), and only got back into Magic fairly recently. A lot of the early history, such as it was</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29305061/8132012_MM:_Numbers_on_a_White_Board?post_id=523004399#523004399</link><description>I don't much care about tournaments either, but the early history does interest me. I started around Revised, fell away completely around Exodus (hello, irony), and only got back into Magic fairly recently. A lot of the early history, such as it was</description><pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2012 14:45:25 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Yeah, tourneys and leagues and such don't interest me, BUT, I do like the historical look back at M:TG. I started with one Revised Starter deck back in either '94 or '95 and was hooked. Bought InQuest magazine, dabbled with The Duelist and loved my S</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29305061/8132012_MM:_Numbers_on_a_White_Board?post_id=522959141#522959141</link><description>Yeah, tourneys and leagues and such don't interest me, BUT, I do like the historical look back at M:TG. I started with one Revised Starter deck back in either '94 or '95 and was hooked. Bought InQuest magazine, dabbled with The Duelist and loved my S</description><pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2012 11:37:24 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Hmm. Not really a very interesting article, to me. Organised Play has never been especially interesting to me. That's fine - it just means I'm not in the target audience.But I note that also Mark's articles usually have a couple of pages of comments</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29305061/8132012_MM:_Numbers_on_a_White_Board?post_id=522954611#522954611</link><description>Hmm. Not really a very interesting article, to me. Organised Play has never been especially interesting to me. That's fine - it just means I'm not in the target audience.But I note that also Mark's articles usually have a couple of pages of comments</description><pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2012 08:58:23 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I laughed so hard at this. Had to leave my laptop and continue reading later.And again.Awesome read. Thanks.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29305061/8132012_MM:_Numbers_on_a_White_Board?post_id=522948153#522948153</link><description>I laughed so hard at this. Had to leave my laptop and continue reading later.And again.Awesome read. Thanks.</description><pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2012 02:12:44 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>What a disappointment. From the headline I thought this was going to be a nice history article. Then when I clicked on the link I saw it was just some article by MaRo - that equalled insta-leave.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29305061/8132012_MM:_Numbers_on_a_White_Board?post_id=522947371#522947371</link><description>What a disappointment. From the headline I thought this was going to be a nice history article. Then when I clicked on the link I saw it was just some article by MaRo - that equalled insta-leave.</description><pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2012 00:47:40 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
