<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: 1v1 Specialists, LET'S DO THIS</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29221323/1v1_Specialists,_LETS_DO_THIS</link><description>Gentlemen, BEHOLD! I have noticed that the decklist and strategies pages sometimes get clogged up with discussions on 3 or 4 player FFA, 2HG, or people throwing around the term "Straw Man" like they just got back from a vacation to Oz. I feel, in a s</description><item><title>I would also love to see that happening. Mobius his reasoning is great and a lot of fun to see. Some of his builds really worked for me. For example the aggro Lilliana build in this thread has won me a easy round in the top tier tactis tournament aga</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29221323/1v1_Specialists,_LETS_DO_THIS?post_id=525882245#525882245</link><description>I would also love to see that happening. Mobius his reasoning is great and a lot of fun to see. Some of his builds really worked for me. For example the aggro Lilliana build in this thread has won me a easy round in the top tier tactis tournament aga</description><pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 08:26:48 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Being primarily a 1v1 player, I would like to see this thread resurrected considering the 7 new decks. Plus, I want to know more of how Mobius thinks, because he pretty much kicks my a$$ whenever we play. Except the time I drew 2x Time Warp at 2 life</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29221323/1v1_Specialists,_LETS_DO_THIS?post_id=525882009#525882009</link><description>Being primarily a 1v1 player, I would like to see this thread resurrected considering the 7 new decks. Plus, I want to know more of how Mobius thinks, because he pretty much kicks my a$$ whenever we play. Except the time I drew 2x Time Warp at 2 life</description><pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 08:17:37 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>I miss this thread</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29221323/1v1_Specialists,_LETS_DO_THIS?post_id=525881711#525881711</link><description>I miss this thread</description><pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 08:06:37 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>I'm confused by the reasoning behind a couple of the include/excludes. Why exclude     Soul of the Harvest                                 just because it doesn't trigger with tokens? There's only one card in that deck that produces tokens. For one m</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29221323/1v1_Specialists,_LETS_DO_THIS?post_id=525117961#525117961</link><description>I'm confused by the reasoning behind a couple of the include/excludes. Why exclude     Soul of the Harvest                                 just because it doesn't trigger with tokens? There's only one card in that deck that produces tokens. For one m</description><pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2012 03:03:23 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>&gt; 46,000. I will freely admit that many players are horrible, but the way ELO (and magic/mana screw) work is that you lose a lot of rating by losing even one game to a low skilled player so you need a pretty decent w/l record to advance up.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29221323/1v1_Specialists,_LETS_DO_THIS?post_id=524881177#524881177</link><description>&gt; 46,000. I will freely admit that many players are horrible, but the way ELO (and magic/mana screw) work is that you lose a lot of rating by losing even one game to a low skilled player so you need a pretty decent w/l record to advance up.</description><pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2012 06:19:39 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
