New Posts For Thread: 07/04/2012 Feature Article: "Magic 2013 Update Bulletin"http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29216761/07042012_Feature_Article:_Magic_2013_Update_BulletinThis thread is for discussion of this Feature Article, which goes live Wednesday morning on magicthegathering.com.Assembly Hall has to say "You may reveal a creature card from your hand." You cannot be forced to reveal a specific kind of card from your hand, because it is a hidden zone. This is the same reason that Flashhttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29216761/07042012_Feature_Article:_Magic_2013_Update_Bulletin?post_id=522911531#522911531Assembly Hall has to say "You may reveal a creature card from your hand." You cannot be forced to reveal a specific kind of card from your hand, because it is a hidden zone. This is the same reason that FlashSun, 12 Aug 2012 02:39:19 -0500I think the "if you do" clause on Transmute Artifact is necessary, because that is what players would expect it to do. It is supposed to transmute an artifact, turn one artifact into another, not create a new one fhttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29216761/07042012_Feature_Article:_Magic_2013_Update_Bulletin?post_id=522835507#522835507I think the "if you do" clause on Transmute Artifact is necessary, because that is what players would expect it to do. It is supposed to transmute an artifact, turn one artifact into another, not create a new one fThu, 09 Aug 2012 18:43:21 -0500The bolded part is one of many opinions on that subject (and one I sometimes find myself disagreeing with). However, power level did not factor into my decision on Transmute Artifact. I made the best attempt to reasonably interpret a Magic card thathttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29216761/07042012_Feature_Article:_Magic_2013_Update_Bulletin?post_id=522832367#522832367The bolded part is one of many opinions on that subject (and one I sometimes find myself disagreeing with). However, power level did not factor into my decision on Transmute Artifact. I made the best attempt to reasonably interpret a Magic card thatThu, 09 Aug 2012 17:02:40 -0500The power level of the wording isn't really relevant to whether the current wording is correct or not. If the correct wording ends up too powerful, it can/should be banned or restricted in the formats it's legal in. Look at Time Vaulthttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29216761/07042012_Feature_Article:_Magic_2013_Update_Bulletin?post_id=522825487#522825487The power level of the wording isn't really relevant to whether the current wording is correct or not. If the correct wording ends up too powerful, it can/should be banned or restricted in the formats it's legal in. Look at Time VaultThu, 09 Aug 2012 14:27:14 -0500The printed wordings of these two cards are very different. The team is happy with both of them.http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29216761/07042012_Feature_Article:_Magic_2013_Update_Bulletin?post_id=522820695#522820695The printed wordings of these two cards are very different. The team is happy with both of them.Thu, 09 Aug 2012 12:14:37 -0500