<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: 06/01/2012 LD: "Multiplayer Development"</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29151729/06012012_LD:_Multiplayer_Development</link><description>This thread is for discussion of this week's Latest Developments, which goes live Friday morning on magicthegathering.com.</description><item><title>What would I like to see more of?I'd like a return to cards that affect "all" rather than "you control"; more     Crusade                                 effects over     Honor of the Pure                                 effects.  Aside from allowing</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29151729/06012012_LD:_Multiplayer_Development?post_id=520781977#520781977</link><description>What would I like to see more of?I'd like a return to cards that affect "all" rather than "you control"; more     Crusade                                 effects over     Honor of the Pure                                 effects.  Aside from allowing</description><pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2012 12:22:44 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Plus, casual tends to be a place where you can get away with more Johnny shenanigans.Another thing for multiplayer is politics. Nothing quite like running a     Curse of Stalked Prey                                 or     Edric, Spymaster of Trest</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29151729/06012012_LD:_Multiplayer_Development?post_id=520459697#520459697</link><description>Plus, casual tends to be a place where you can get away with more Johnny shenanigans.Another thing for multiplayer is politics. Nothing quite like running a     Curse of Stalked Prey                                 or     Edric, Spymaster of Trest</description><pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2012 18:34:43 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I know at one point, all the card images were borderless 200x285, with the card borders on Gatherer pages drawn in separate images (black, white, silver, or Alpha borders).</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29151729/06012012_LD:_Multiplayer_Development?post_id=520430887#520430887</link><description>I know at one point, all the card images were borderless 200x285, with the card borders on Gatherer pages drawn in separate images (black, white, silver, or Alpha borders).</description><pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2012 07:13:28 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I believe it's a coding problem. It definitely doesn't have anything to do with bandwidth. If bandwidth was the issue, there'd be any number of far more effective options than cutting the borders off a few measly card images.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29151729/06012012_LD:_Multiplayer_Development?post_id=520425407#520425407</link><description>I believe it's a coding problem. It definitely doesn't have anything to do with bandwidth. If bandwidth was the issue, there'd be any number of far more effective options than cutting the borders off a few measly card images.</description><pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2012 01:45:59 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I strongly disagree. I don't see that having any upside at all.[/quote]The logistics possibly aren't worth it, but why do you disagree?  Foils are basically all upside - people who like collecting things get to have foils, and people who don't care c</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29151729/06012012_LD:_Multiplayer_Development?post_id=520421191#520421191</link><description>I strongly disagree. I don't see that having any upside at all.[/quote]The logistics possibly aren't worth it, but why do you disagree?  Foils are basically all upside - people who like collecting things get to have foils, and people who don't care c</description><pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2012 20:47:50 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
