<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: 05/16/2012 BoaB: "Budget Reanimator"</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29120065/05162012_BoaB:_Budget_Reanimator</link><description>This thread is for discussion of this week's Building on a Budget, which goes live Wednesday morning on magicthegathering.com.</description><item><title>AGrowth                                 isn't ramp :(.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29120065/05162012_BoaB:_Budget_Reanimator?post_id=519925895#519925895</link><description>AGrowth                                 isn't ramp :(.</description><pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 15:56:44 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Is it just me or with the reanimator deck, wouldn't abundent growth be a better option than birds of paradise? It fixes the mana. It's harder to remove an enchantment then a 0/1 creature, and you get to draw a card, so it replaces itself.  Seems a be</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29120065/05162012_BoaB:_Budget_Reanimator?post_id=519915685#519915685</link><description>Is it just me or with the reanimator deck, wouldn't abundent growth be a better option than birds of paradise? It fixes the mana. It's harder to remove an enchantment then a 0/1 creature, and you get to draw a card, so it replaces itself.  Seems a be</description><pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 10:31:46 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I know they do it because it sells packs. That's why in my post I said "putting them at rare makes us lots of money". The problem is, they're making this money at the expense of what's good for their players.Lands do nothing but facilitate the playin</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29120065/05162012_BoaB:_Budget_Reanimator?post_id=519896317#519896317</link><description>I know they do it because it sells packs. That's why in my post I said "putting them at rare makes us lots of money". The problem is, they're making this money at the expense of what's good for their players.Lands do nothing but facilitate the playin</description><pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 16:46:05 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>There's a quote by Maro saying that they keep most duals at rare to sell packs.www.reddit.com/r/magicTCG/comments/s6iw9...</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29120065/05162012_BoaB:_Budget_Reanimator?post_id=519887441#519887441</link><description>There's a quote by Maro saying that they keep most duals at rare to sell packs.www.reddit.com/r/magicTCG/comments/s6iw9...</description><pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 12:01:28 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>It'd be slightly more accurate to say their reasoning is "Since the very first dual lands were rare, nobody questions WHY something that does nothing more than facilitate the playing of spells is rare these days, and putting them at rare makes us lot</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29120065/05162012_BoaB:_Budget_Reanimator?post_id=519876721#519876721</link><description>It'd be slightly more accurate to say their reasoning is "Since the very first dual lands were rare, nobody questions WHY something that does nothing more than facilitate the playing of spells is rare these days, and putting them at rare makes us lot</description><pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 05:38:45 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
