<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: rdw in legacy?</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29120005/rdw_in_legacy</link><description>how proficient and quick is it in current matchups?  My other question is: would many of the standard list rdw cards be efficient in legacy?  I dont see why a rdw wouldnt use     stromkirk noble                                 or     chandra's phoeni</description><item><title>Except that the fuctionality of both     Goblin Guide                                 and     Keldon Marauders                                 in relation to a Durn deck are the same. Control decks need to have a nice split of control, card advantage</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29120005/rdw_in_legacy?post_id=520174731#520174731</link><description>Except that the fuctionality of both     Goblin Guide                                 and     Keldon Marauders                                 in relation to a Durn deck are the same. Control decks need to have a nice split of control, card advantage</description><pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 13:29:12 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>It absolutely does make them related.  What they have in common is that they are two of the best creatures to run in a burn deck.  The fact that two cards can go in the same deck is the best reason to compare them, and they don't need to be incredibl</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29120005/rdw_in_legacy?post_id=520169785#520169785</link><description>It absolutely does make them related.  What they have in common is that they are two of the best creatures to run in a burn deck.  The fact that two cards can go in the same deck is the best reason to compare them, and they don't need to be incredibl</description><pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 11:25:38 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>It absolutely does make them related.  What they have in common is that they are two of the best creatures to run in a burn deck.  The fact that two cards can go in the same deck is the best reason to compare them, and they don't need to be incredibl</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29120005/rdw_in_legacy?post_id=520120609#520120609</link><description>It absolutely does make them related.  What they have in common is that they are two of the best creatures to run in a burn deck.  The fact that two cards can go in the same deck is the best reason to compare them, and they don't need to be incredibl</description><pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 01:47:44 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>That was my original question though, who the hell said anything about Keldon Marauders and what the hell does it have to do with Goblin Guide?Again, I could see if we were talking about something like     Mog Fanatic</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29120005/rdw_in_legacy?post_id=520088767#520088767</link><description>That was my original question though, who the hell said anything about Keldon Marauders and what the hell does it have to do with Goblin Guide?Again, I could see if we were talking about something like     Mog Fanatic</description><pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 08:03:32 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>"Its drawback does not make it definitively better or worse than a Keldon Marauders."That is what I posted. This isn't even semantics. The only thing that is happening, is you are taking my statement entirely out of context. Your reading comprehensio</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29120005/rdw_in_legacy?post_id=520079577#520079577</link><description>"Its drawback does not make it definitively better or worse than a Keldon Marauders."That is what I posted. This isn't even semantics. The only thing that is happening, is you are taking my statement entirely out of context. Your reading comprehensio</description><pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 00:00:18 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
