<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: 05/02/2012 BoaB: "Restoration Hardware Continued"</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29094149/05022012_BoaB:_Restoration_Hardware_Continued</link><description>This thread is for discussion of this week's Building on a Budget, which goes live Wednesday morning on magicthegathering.com.</description><item><title>My proposition for more budget friendly, but i think that also more competitive (although numbers may be inacurate) deck.LANDS - 214x    Buried Ruin                                 3x    Phyrexia's Core                                 14x    Plains</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29094149/05022012_BoaB:_Restoration_Hardware_Continued?post_id=519409007#519409007</link><description>My proposition for more budget friendly, but i think that also more competitive (although numbers may be inacurate) deck.LANDS - 214x    Buried Ruin                                 3x    Phyrexia's Core                                 14x    Plains</description><pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2012 19:52:52 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>$25/month seems low for a total "fun" budget; I'd expect even someone on minimum wage to have more available than that.  However, let's say that that is your Magic budget, and not worry about other recreational expenditures (because there's more to l</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29094149/05022012_BoaB:_Restoration_Hardware_Continued?post_id=519312159#519312159</link><description>$25/month seems low for a total "fun" budget; I'd expect even someone on minimum wage to have more available than that.  However, let's say that that is your Magic budget, and not worry about other recreational expenditures (because there's more to l</description><pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 01:57:32 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I think that the key about "budget" is not the amount, but rather the principle.  My wife and I have a 'fun' budget of $25 per month each.  We do not let the other go over that amount, except under extrememly rare circumstances (and the amount over c</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29094149/05022012_BoaB:_Restoration_Hardware_Continued?post_id=519309681#519309681</link><description>I think that the key about "budget" is not the amount, but rather the principle.  My wife and I have a 'fun' budget of $25 per month each.  We do not let the other go over that amount, except under extrememly rare circumstances (and the amount over c</description><pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 21:57:15 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Most of what people are saying (and have been saying for some time now) is how this is supposed to a BUDGET column. Budget decks in generally will not be uber competitive, but we expect these columns to be at the bare minimum:1) Without constant erro</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29094149/05022012_BoaB:_Restoration_Hardware_Continued?post_id=519298595#519298595</link><description>Most of what people are saying (and have been saying for some time now) is how this is supposed to a BUDGET column. Budget decks in generally will not be uber competitive, but we expect these columns to be at the bare minimum:1) Without constant erro</description><pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 15:44:26 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>First one: Could he maybe, just possibly, have meant     INTANGIBLE VIRTUE                                ? Same cost, same bonus, very similar. When you have to output this much, you are going to make mistakes.Second one: I missed the "non-angel" cl</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29094149/05022012_BoaB:_Restoration_Hardware_Continued?post_id=519293861#519293861</link><description>First one: Could he maybe, just possibly, have meant     INTANGIBLE VIRTUE                                ? Same cost, same bonus, very similar. When you have to output this much, you are going to make mistakes.Second one: I missed the "non-angel" cl</description><pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 13:03:50 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
