<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: 05/01/2012 ReConstructed: "Welcome to Innistrad Block Constructed"</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29092255/05012012_ReConstructed:_Welcome_to_Innistrad_Block_Constructed</link><description>This thread is for discussion of this week's ReConstructed, which goes live Tuesday morning on magicthegathering.com.</description><item><title>How are there no legitimate ramp decks? There are so many exciting fatties coming up in Avacyn Restored... Sure, the other two sets were very ramp barren, but with Avacyn's Pilgrim and Somberwald sage, I sent in a deck that could get Gisela, Blade of</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29092255/05012012_ReConstructed:_Welcome_to_Innistrad_Block_Constructed?post_id=519297829#519297829</link><description>How are there no legitimate ramp decks? There are so many exciting fatties coming up in Avacyn Restored... Sure, the other two sets were very ramp barren, but with Avacyn's Pilgrim and Somberwald sage, I sent in a deck that could get Gisela, Blade of</description><pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 15:19:08 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Funny part is when I made that Delver deck it was based from a draft</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29092255/05012012_ReConstructed:_Welcome_to_Innistrad_Block_Constructed?post_id=519267937#519267937</link><description>Funny part is when I made that Delver deck it was based from a draft</description><pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 17:04:52 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>No use of Hellrider in RG werewolf decks? It's just so broken you have to test using 4 of in any creature deck containing significant red.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29092255/05012012_ReConstructed:_Welcome_to_Innistrad_Block_Constructed?post_id=519221931#519221931</link><description>No use of Hellrider in RG werewolf decks? It's just so broken you have to test using 4 of in any creature deck containing significant red.</description><pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 12:24:34 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Mmmmm... Invisible Stalker sandwiches...</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29092255/05012012_ReConstructed:_Welcome_to_Innistrad_Block_Constructed?post_id=519220017#519220017</link><description>Mmmmm... Invisible Stalker sandwiches...</description><pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 11:20:34 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Thanks for all the comments so far!That must have just been a typo while transposing my written decklist onto the page. (Note how the deck is also 61 cards.) Thanks for pointing that out - it should be fixed soon. :)The Alchemist doesn't need to atta</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29092255/05012012_ReConstructed:_Welcome_to_Innistrad_Block_Constructed?post_id=519217253#519217253</link><description>Thanks for all the comments so far!That must have just been a typo while transposing my written decklist onto the page. (Note how the deck is also 61 cards.) Thanks for pointing that out - it should be fixed soon. :)The Alchemist doesn't need to atta</description><pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 10:01:37 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
