New Posts For Thread: 04/30/2012 MM: "Avacyn-gle Ladies, Part 2"http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29086621/04302012_MM:_Avacyn-gle_Ladies,_Part_2This thread is for discussion of this week's Making Magic, which goes live Monday morning on magicthegathering.com.Sure, I can certainly agree to disagree with the above (with me preferring the vice versa).One final reply then =)But isn't this ultimately the other way around then? (For ease, cards that are stronger/weaker than they look are left out from the follhttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29086621/04302012_MM:_Avacyn-gle_Ladies,_Part_2?post_id=519664153#519664153Sure, I can certainly agree to disagree with the above (with me preferring the vice versa).One final reply then =)But isn't this ultimately the other way around then? (For ease, cards that are stronger/weaker than they look are left out from the follMon, 14 May 2012 04:53:26 -0500Until they actually have the cards to swap in, though, they don't need to learn that some cards aren't worth playing.[/quote]Yes, but from Wizards' perspective, they need to know that some cards aren't worth playing, so that they'll make the effort thttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29086621/04302012_MM:_Avacyn-gle_Ladies,_Part_2?post_id=519662831#519662831Until they actually have the cards to swap in, though, they don't need to learn that some cards aren't worth playing.[/quote]Yes, but from Wizards' perspective, they need to know that some cards aren't worth playing, so that they'll make the effort tMon, 14 May 2012 03:10:02 -0500You can't be 'more' or 'less' infallible. It's a switch. Either you are without fault, or you're not. My point was that all it takes is the occasional mistake, which will happen because nobody is perfect, to snowball into a potential for any borderlihttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29086621/04302012_MM:_Avacyn-gle_Ladies,_Part_2?post_id=519652217#519652217You can't be 'more' or 'less' infallible. It's a switch. Either you are without fault, or you're not. My point was that all it takes is the occasional mistake, which will happen because nobody is perfect, to snowball into a potential for any borderliSun, 13 May 2012 15:58:58 -0500Pros are spending countless hours on figuring out limited. If there suddenly are no unplayables, they'll know.And of course not 'everyone' will know things. Not all cards are made for everyone. Again, they are far more infaillible in Limited than inhttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29086621/04302012_MM:_Avacyn-gle_Ladies,_Part_2?post_id=519648635#519648635Pros are spending countless hours on figuring out limited. If there suddenly are no unplayables, they'll know.And of course not 'everyone' will know things. Not all cards are made for everyone. Again, they are far more infaillible in Limited than inSun, 13 May 2012 14:26:27 -0500That assumes two things. One, that everyone knows that Wizards designs every card to be playable; they could stop designing unplayable cards without announcing that they're doing it. Two, that Wizards is infallible.All it takes is one mistake every ohttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29086621/04302012_MM:_Avacyn-gle_Ladies,_Part_2?post_id=519628435#519628435That assumes two things. One, that everyone knows that Wizards designs every card to be playable; they could stop designing unplayable cards without announcing that they're doing it. Two, that Wizards is infallible.All it takes is one mistake every oSun, 13 May 2012 01:56:24 -0500