New Posts For Thread: 04/16/2012 MM: "Avacyn-gle Ladies, Part 1"http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29072979/04162012_MM:_Avacyn-gle_Ladies,_Part_1This thread is for discussion of this week's Making Magic, which goes live Monday morning on magicthegathering.com.While your argument is, on the surface, correct, Small-Set New Phyrexia makes sense from the "corruption" point of view.Rise of Eldrazi and Avacyn Restored were both large sets following a huge earth-shattering change. This change took place in a fihttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29072979/04162012_MM:_Avacyn-gle_Ladies,_Part_1?post_id=519124481#519124481While your argument is, on the surface, correct, Small-Set New Phyrexia makes sense from the "corruption" point of view.Rise of Eldrazi and Avacyn Restored were both large sets following a huge earth-shattering change. This change took place in a fiSat, 28 Apr 2012 14:11:42 -0500While your argument is, on the surface, correct, Small-Set New Phyrexia makes sense from the "corruption" point of view.Rise of Eldrazi and Avacyn Restored were both large sets following a huge earth-shattering change. This change took place in a fihttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29072979/04162012_MM:_Avacyn-gle_Ladies,_Part_1?post_id=519115373#519115373While your argument is, on the surface, correct, Small-Set New Phyrexia makes sense from the "corruption" point of view.Rise of Eldrazi and Avacyn Restored were both large sets following a huge earth-shattering change. This change took place in a fiSat, 28 Apr 2012 10:24:56 -0500Okay I have to step in here because I get kind of sick of people always bringing this up. There was NOT meant to be a cycle of multi-colored mythic creatures to begin with. There was just supposed to be a cycle of super splashy creature type orientedhttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29072979/04162012_MM:_Avacyn-gle_Ladies,_Part_1?post_id=519096519#519096519Okay I have to step in here because I get kind of sick of people always bringing this up. There was NOT meant to be a cycle of multi-colored mythic creatures to begin with. There was just supposed to be a cycle of super splashy creature type orientedFri, 27 Apr 2012 18:22:40 -0500Okay I have to step in here because I get kind of sick of people always bringing this up. There was NOT meant to be a cycle of multi-colored mythic creatures to begin with. There was just supposed to be a cycle of super splashy creature type orientedhttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29072979/04162012_MM:_Avacyn-gle_Ladies,_Part_1?post_id=519071511#519071511Okay I have to step in here because I get kind of sick of people always bringing this up. There was NOT meant to be a cycle of multi-colored mythic creatures to begin with. There was just supposed to be a cycle of super splashy creature type orientedFri, 27 Apr 2012 05:20:45 -0500A foreign language feels like chaos until you can read it. Our concepts of beauty and ugly are influenced by what we understand and what we don't.Safe (simple) is not always the best answer. Otherwise all creatures would be vanilla. NWO eliminates cohttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29072979/04162012_MM:_Avacyn-gle_Ladies,_Part_1?post_id=519069741#519069741A foreign language feels like chaos until you can read it. Our concepts of beauty and ugly are influenced by what we understand and what we don't.Safe (simple) is not always the best answer. Otherwise all creatures would be vanilla. NWO eliminates coFri, 27 Apr 2012 03:15:24 -0500