<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: 04/20/2012 LD: "Gonna Hate"</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29071531/04202012_LD:_Gonna_Hate</link><description>This thread is for discussion of this week's Latest Developments, which goes live Friday morning on magicthegathering.com.</description><item><title>BTW what I was getting out is mana leak is quite weak.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29071531/04202012_LD:_Gonna_Hate?post_id=520913489#520913489</link><description>BTW what I was getting out is mana leak is quite weak.</description><pubDate>Sun, 17 Jun 2012 00:44:07 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I am mostly a Red playing but I have dabbled in blue time to time. But Gone are the days I worry about casting spells when there are 2 U on the board untapped and a card in my oppunites hand.... Standard has been all about agro for way to long. Hones</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29071531/04202012_LD:_Gonna_Hate?post_id=520913479#520913479</link><description>I am mostly a Red playing but I have dabbled in blue time to time. But Gone are the days I worry about casting spells when there are 2 U on the board untapped and a card in my oppunites hand.... Standard has been all about agro for way to long. Hones</description><pubDate>Sun, 17 Jun 2012 00:43:38 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>The more I read this article, the more angry and betrayed I feel.  Not because they printed Cavern, I can deal with that as part of the changing nature of the game, but because a person of his importance in development seems to dismiss one of the way</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29071531/04202012_LD:_Gonna_Hate?post_id=519048877#519048877</link><description>The more I read this article, the more angry and betrayed I feel.  Not because they printed Cavern, I can deal with that as part of the changing nature of the game, but because a person of his importance in development seems to dismiss one of the way</description><pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 11:49:28 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>That simplistic theoretical thinking is what Wizards figured in the early days as well. That didn't work out that well. Wizards is NOT okay with Stalker, they see it as a mistake. I feel the problem is Hexproof in blue. How many of the cards with Hex</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29071531/04202012_LD:_Gonna_Hate?post_id=519002033#519002033</link><description>That simplistic theoretical thinking is what Wizards figured in the early days as well. That didn't work out that well. Wizards is NOT okay with Stalker, they see it as a mistake. I feel the problem is Hexproof in blue. How many of the cards with Hex</description><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 08:20:38 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Yup.That's pretty much the problem, right there.[/quote]I said nothing of the kind. Why would you summarize my position as the exact opposite of what I said?[/quote]Must have quoted the wrong thing.  Oops.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29071531/04202012_LD:_Gonna_Hate?post_id=518990069#518990069</link><description>Yup.That's pretty much the problem, right there.[/quote]I said nothing of the kind. Why would you summarize my position as the exact opposite of what I said?[/quote]Must have quoted the wrong thing.  Oops.</description><pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 19:14:10 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
