<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: 04/18/2012 BoaB: "Bound by Haste"</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29067539/04182012_BoaB:_Bound_by_Haste</link><description>This thread is for discussion of this week's Building on a Budget, which goes live Wednesday morning on magicthegathering.com.</description><item><title>The drawback is that it requires you to control another creature if you want it to have haste when you play it (otherwise there's nothing to...soulbind?).</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29067539/04182012_BoaB:_Bound_by_Haste?post_id=518775999#518775999</link><description>The drawback is that it requires you to control another creature if you want it to have haste when you play it (otherwise there's nothing to...soulbind?).</description><pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 21:55:20 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>In limited, I think a lack of patience will often be useful and interesting.  Imagine this, you have a single 3/3 on the board and your opponent has a 4/4.  You play Lightning Mauler, pair it with the 3/3 and attack with both.  How does your opponent</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29067539/04182012_BoaB:_Bound_by_Haste?post_id=518753789#518753789</link><description>In limited, I think a lack of patience will often be useful and interesting.  Imagine this, you have a single 3/3 on the board and your opponent has a 4/4.  You play Lightning Mauler, pair it with the 3/3 and attack with both.  How does your opponent</description><pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 11:43:00 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Also he says that a 2/1 haste for R1 isnt constructed playable. I would like to disagree. For one, we havent had a 2 mana haste mono red guy with no drawbacks. If goblin warbuggy was playable why wouldnt it be playable without the echo. I actually th</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29067539/04182012_BoaB:_Bound_by_Haste?post_id=518751355#518751355</link><description>Also he says that a 2/1 haste for R1 isnt constructed playable. I would like to disagree. For one, we havent had a 2 mana haste mono red guy with no drawbacks. If goblin warbuggy was playable why wouldnt it be playable without the echo. I actually th</description><pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 10:32:56 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I agree with Amar that this is not a good application of this card (Pili-Pala/Grand Architect/Lightning Mauler).  In Modern on T2, I'd much rather play Lightning Greaves than Mauler.  If your opponent has instant removal, then mauler is gone while Pi</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29067539/04182012_BoaB:_Bound_by_Haste?post_id=518748503#518748503</link><description>I agree with Amar that this is not a good application of this card (Pili-Pala/Grand Architect/Lightning Mauler).  In Modern on T2, I'd much rather play Lightning Greaves than Mauler.  If your opponent has instant removal, then mauler is gone while Pi</description><pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 09:20:37 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>So you guys are saying that JvL recommends adding an extra color and turning 3-card combos into 5-card combos so that your deck will be slightly more suprising to Modern opponents who don't play instants.  Sheesh!  Sorry Jacob, I was just going to sa</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29067539/04182012_BoaB:_Bound_by_Haste?post_id=518745585#518745585</link><description>So you guys are saying that JvL recommends adding an extra color and turning 3-card combos into 5-card combos so that your deck will be slightly more suprising to Modern opponents who don't play instants.  Sheesh!  Sorry Jacob, I was just going to sa</description><pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 07:40:18 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
