<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: BWR Double-Date</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29020525/BWR_Double-Date</link><description>So, this is a deck that I came up with starting with Shaheen Soorani's Esper Planeswalkers deck that LSV and a few MODO people have been playing recently. I came up with it after seeing a BWR Control deck by another user of this forum (Cranial Distra</description><item><title>I've been wondering if Angelic Wall would pop up anywhere.  That said, I'm not convcinced this deck particularly wants it since it doesn't cantrip like Wall of Omens and it's totally useless for winning.  Maybe it would be useful in a UW control shel</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29020525/BWR_Double-Date?post_id=519269277#519269277</link><description>I've been wondering if Angelic Wall would pop up anywhere.  That said, I'm not convcinced this deck particularly wants it since it doesn't cantrip like Wall of Omens and it's totally useless for winning.  Maybe it would be useful in a UW control shel</description><pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 17:49:54 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>So, here is my idea for BWR Planeswalker Control3 x     Plains                                3 x     Mountain                                3 x     Evolving Wilds                                5 x     Swamp                                4 x     I</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29020525/BWR_Double-Date?post_id=519268339#519268339</link><description>So, here is my idea for BWR Planeswalker Control3 x     Plains                                3 x     Mountain                                3 x     Evolving Wilds                                5 x     Swamp                                4 x     I</description><pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 17:17:37 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Must...not...let...thread....die....*gasp*So I think this is what I will be screwing around with once AVR becomes legal. I decided to stray from the Chandra route in favor of some more solid lasting removal via red. Whether this actually pans out or</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29020525/BWR_Double-Date?post_id=519065803#519065803</link><description>Must...not...let...thread....die....*gasp*So I think this is what I will be screwing around with once AVR becomes legal. I decided to stray from the Chandra route in favor of some more solid lasting removal via red. Whether this actually pans out or</description><pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 20:48:58 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Just try 1 KarnLike I sad you have removals. You deal with them that might have hex or tokens or whatever. Karn is perfect late hit that will hurt opponent. Just test once or 2 to see how that feel. It been great with UB. Karn is big threat. Just 1 K</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29020525/BWR_Double-Date?post_id=518904427#518904427</link><description>Just try 1 KarnLike I sad you have removals. You deal with them that might have hex or tokens or whatever. Karn is perfect late hit that will hurt opponent. Just test once or 2 to see how that feel. It been great with UB. Karn is big threat. Just 1 K</description><pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2012 12:36:38 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Don't like.  He's good if things are more or less going my way, but otherwise I'm trying to get faster and more relevant, not slower and less relevant.He's bad against 75+ percent of the meta.  If I'm facing Tokens, Delver or even most aggro decks, h</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/29020525/BWR_Double-Date?post_id=518884747#518884747</link><description>Don't like.  He's good if things are more or less going my way, but otherwise I'm trying to get faster and more relevant, not slower and less relevant.He's bad against 75+ percent of the meta.  If I'm facing Tokens, Delver or even most aggro decks, h</description><pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2012 20:16:53 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
