New Posts For Thread: Innistrad Limited -- Dominated by Rares, Mana Issues and Muliganshttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/28878229/Innistrad_Limited_--_Dominated_by_Rares,_Mana_Issues_and_MuligansEvery limited format will have a plurality of wins and loses decided by Rare [Bombs], Mana Issues and Muligans, but it seems that Innistrad is particularly bad in this regard. In fact, I can't even remember the last Innistrad limited match where at lSince DII is now over (for me) I've decided to write up the final tallys: Mana: 38 Bomb: 32 Muligan: 8 Mana + Bomb: 15 Mana + Muligan: 6 MMM + Non MMM: 7 Non MMM: 13So the results were as expected, excluding MMM + non MMM causes, 70% involve a singlehttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/28878229/Innistrad_Limited_--_Dominated_by_Rares,_Mana_Issues_and_Muligans?post_id=519999383#519999383Since DII is now over (for me) I've decided to write up the final tallys: Mana: 38 Bomb: 32 Muligan: 8 Mana + Bomb: 15 Mana + Muligan: 6 MMM + Non MMM: 7 Non MMM: 13So the results were as expected, excluding MMM + non MMM causes, 70% involve a singleWed, 23 May 2012 21:24:26 -0500I've decided to keep the list up to date. Only counting the lost games, we have the following counts: Mana: 25 Bomb: 26 Muligan: 5 Mana + Bomb: 11Mana + Muligan: 5 MMM + Non MMM: 5 Non MMM: 9 So excluding the MMM + non MMM Causes, we have 69% of losshttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/28878229/Innistrad_Limited_--_Dominated_by_Rares,_Mana_Issues_and_Muligans?post_id=518876603#518876603I've decided to keep the list up to date. Only counting the lost games, we have the following counts: Mana: 25 Bomb: 26 Muligan: 5 Mana + Bomb: 11Mana + Muligan: 5 MMM + Non MMM: 5 Non MMM: 9 So excluding the MMM + non MMM Causes, we have 69% of lossSat, 21 Apr 2012 15:13:32 -0500Now there's a particularly impressive triple M showing. I went 1-2 with an absolutely monster deck, here's how it went down.Game's 1 and 2. Easy wins with cards to spare, my opponent remarked on how crazy good my deck was. My only qualm while makinghttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/28878229/Innistrad_Limited_--_Dominated_by_Rares,_Mana_Issues_and_Muligans?post_id=518374715#518374715Now there's a particularly impressive triple M showing. I went 1-2 with an absolutely monster deck, here's how it went down.Game's 1 and 2. Easy wins with cards to spare, my opponent remarked on how crazy good my deck was. My only qualm while makingSat, 07 Apr 2012 22:35:41 -0500One change, and this has been pretty recent, in my draft style is valuing high CMC removal a lot lower than I used to. I used to love getting cards like Into the Maw of Hell , but after a number of bad experiences phttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/28878229/Innistrad_Limited_--_Dominated_by_Rares,_Mana_Issues_and_Muligans?post_id=517846671#517846671One change, and this has been pretty recent, in my draft style is valuing high CMC removal a lot lower than I used to. I used to love getting cards like Into the Maw of Hell , but after a number of bad experiences pFri, 23 Mar 2012 11:31:18 -0500Looking at the drafts you have posted, I do notice that you definitely favor aggressive rush strategies. That is generally a god idea (particularly in Inn block) as, when done right, they are quite consistent and will beat most other decks consistenhttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/28878229/Innistrad_Limited_--_Dominated_by_Rares,_Mana_Issues_and_Muligans?post_id=517841817#517841817Looking at the drafts you have posted, I do notice that you definitely favor aggressive rush strategies. That is generally a god idea (particularly in Inn block) as, when done right, they are quite consistent and will beat most other decks consistenFri, 23 Mar 2012 08:52:36 -0500