<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: DLCR: Curse of the Nightly Hunt</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/28625569/DLCR:_Curse_of_the_Nightly_Hunt</link><description>Todays ISD Card to rate is...    Curse of the Nightly Hunt                                Spoiler: &#xD; &#xD; Show&#xD; &#xD; 5: terrifyingly, insanely good. always first pick every time, find a way to fit it into your deck.4.5: easy first pick, definitely splashwo</description><item><title>I've seen it in a Werewolf deck. Makes for a rather brutal "I cast nothing -&gt; Werewolves flip -&gt; you have to attack" combo.But yea, it is a very interesting card. Creature that don't want to attack (Field Hunter, early Unruly Mob/Lumbers , etc.) can</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/28625569/DLCR:_Curse_of_the_Nightly_Hunt?post_id=511768277#511768277</link><description>I've seen it in a Werewolf deck. Makes for a rather brutal "I cast nothing -&gt; Werewolves flip -&gt; you have to attack" combo.But yea, it is a very interesting card. Creature that don't want to attack (Field Hunter, early Unruly Mob/Lumbers , etc.) can</description><pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 15:51:03 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>1.5.  This can be quite strong.  "first one to attack loses" boards are surprisingly common, say Der Ubercreature v. a lot of little first strike.  However, a lot of the time it's irrelevant because your opponent is attacking out anyway.  Still, taki</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/28625569/DLCR:_Curse_of_the_Nightly_Hunt?post_id=511764147#511764147</link><description>1.5.  This can be quite strong.  "first one to attack loses" boards are surprisingly common, say Der Ubercreature v. a lot of little first strike.  However, a lot of the time it's irrelevant because your opponent is attacking out anyway.  Still, taki</description><pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 14:35:16 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I agree that it's matchup dependant. I think this is good if you're playing a Green beefy deck against a white Human deck.But I'm not sure what decks should maindeck this. A deck with     Manor Gargoyle                                s and     Creepy</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/28625569/DLCR:_Curse_of_the_Nightly_Hunt?post_id=511756335#511756335</link><description>I agree that it's matchup dependant. I think this is good if you're playing a Green beefy deck against a white Human deck.But I'm not sure what decks should maindeck this. A deck with     Manor Gargoyle                                s and     Creepy</description><pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 12:22:01 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Yeah, this is a tough one. Either it wins you the game or loses it for your because you would have been better off with an actual threat. I'll have to play with it more to find out which one it turns out to be the most often.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/28625569/DLCR:_Curse_of_the_Nightly_Hunt?post_id=511725959#511725959</link><description>Yeah, this is a tough one. Either it wins you the game or loses it for your because you would have been better off with an actual threat. I'll have to play with it more to find out which one it turns out to be the most often.</description><pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 19:10:32 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>This is a really corner-case, but I guess I'll rate it at 1.5. There are some match-ups (and some decks) that want this, and if you're in that spot, having picked one up is worth it. But taking it over any maindeckable durdle seems contraintuitive.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/28625569/DLCR:_Curse_of_the_Nightly_Hunt?post_id=511722495#511722495</link><description>This is a really corner-case, but I guess I'll rate it at 1.5. There are some match-ups (and some decks) that want this, and if you're in that spot, having picked one up is worth it. But taking it over any maindeckable durdle seems contraintuitive.</description><pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 17:18:20 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
