New Posts For Thread: Oracle and Gatherer Ruling Changes - Dark Ascensionhttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/28615751/Oracle_and_Gatherer_Ruling_Changes_-_Dark_AscensionDo you think a card's Oracle wording needs review? Is there an old ruling in Gatherer that is no longer correct? This thread is the best way to let me know about it so it can be reviewed for the Dark Ascension update. A few notes:* M12, Innistrad, anNoted.http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/28615751/Oracle_and_Gatherer_Ruling_Changes_-_Dark_Ascension?post_id=514590533#514590533Noted.Wed, 04 Jan 2012 15:26:30 -0600Here's a Gatherer ruling issue from Turn to Frog (gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?multiverseid=220265):"Effects that modify the targeted creature's power or toughness, such as the effects of Titanic Growth or Honor of the Pure, will applhttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/28615751/Oracle_and_Gatherer_Ruling_Changes_-_Dark_Ascension?post_id=514583659#514583659Here's a Gatherer ruling issue from Turn to Frog (gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?multiverseid=220265):"Effects that modify the targeted creature's power or toughness, such as the effects of Titanic Growth or Honor of the Pure, will applWed, 04 Jan 2012 12:55:32 -0600I completely agree with your last paragraph, if we were talking about designing new cards.My philosophy on older cards is that agreement of Oracle and printed text is of highest importance, with original intent only a secondary concern, and elegancehttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/28615751/Oracle_and_Gatherer_Ruling_Changes_-_Dark_Ascension?post_id=514545493#514545493I completely agree with your last paragraph, if we were talking about designing new cards.My philosophy on older cards is that agreement of Oracle and printed text is of highest importance, with original intent only a secondary concern, and eleganceTue, 03 Jan 2012 15:05:37 -0600I disagree completely.First of all, the way that the enchant ability allows for all enchanting/targetting restrictions to go together in one place is a good thing. Mind Harness wasn't worded the way it is becausehttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/28615751/Oracle_and_Gatherer_Ruling_Changes_-_Dark_Ascension?post_id=514542721#514542721I disagree completely.First of all, the way that the enchant ability allows for all enchanting/targetting restrictions to go together in one place is a good thing. Mind Harness wasn't worded the way it is becauseTue, 03 Jan 2012 14:07:21 -0600Wouldn't restoring Aggression and Mind Harness to their printed wordings ("Enchant creature" with a separate restriction) be the cleanest solution?Aggression:Enchant creatureAggression can target only non-Wall creatures.Enchanted creature has firsthttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/28615751/Oracle_and_Gatherer_Ruling_Changes_-_Dark_Ascension?post_id=514534387#514534387Wouldn't restoring Aggression and Mind Harness to their printed wordings ("Enchant creature" with a separate restriction) be the cleanest solution?Aggression:Enchant creatureAggression can target only non-Wall creatures.Enchanted creature has firstTue, 03 Jan 2012 10:29:23 -0600