<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: [Archetype] Red Deck Wins - RDW</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/28506651/Archetype_Red_Deck_Wins_-_RDW</link><description>Red Deck Wins - RDWWhat is Red Deck Wins? &#xD; &#xD; Show&#xD; &#xD; Red Deck Wins - or RDW for short - is an archetypical aggro deck. Aggro decks are basically aggressive decks trying to reduce an opponent's life to zero as fast as possible without your opponent s</description><item><title>At my last FNM I ran this interesting mixutre:17 x     Mountain                                 4 x     Dragonskull Summit                                4 x     Reckless Waif                                4 x     Vexing Devil</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/28506651/Archetype_Red_Deck_Wins_-_RDW?post_id=523773551#523773551</link><description>At my last FNM I ran this interesting mixutre:17 x     Mountain                                 4 x     Dragonskull Summit                                4 x     Reckless Waif                                4 x     Vexing Devil</description><pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2012 00:30:19 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>so i have made a rdw deck on mtgo what do yall think?stromkirk noble x4reckless waif x3stonewright x4vexing devil x4mogg flunkies x4lightning maulter x4torch fiend x2loyal cathar x2devil's play x1pillar x3incinerate x3brimstone volley x4thunderous  w</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/28506651/Archetype_Red_Deck_Wins_-_RDW?post_id=523450841#523450841</link><description>so i have made a rdw deck on mtgo what do yall think?stromkirk noble x4reckless waif x3stonewright x4vexing devil x4mogg flunkies x4lightning maulter x4torch fiend x2loyal cathar x2devil's play x1pillar x3incinerate x3brimstone volley x4thunderous  w</description><pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2012 00:45:25 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I dont think the whelp, dragon, blood, and volcanic strength are good enough. Some that may be "good enough" but iffy are krenko, hound, and vexing devil (krenko will be bad if we dont get more goblins, hound competes with hellrider). Anyway, you for</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/28506651/Archetype_Red_Deck_Wins_-_RDW?post_id=523415423#523415423</link><description>I dont think the whelp, dragon, blood, and volcanic strength are good enough. Some that may be "good enough" but iffy are krenko, hound, and vexing devil (krenko will be bad if we dont get more goblins, hound competes with hellrider). Anyway, you for</description><pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2012 03:27:06 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Goblin ArsonistDevils PlayPillar Of FlameLightning MaulerVolcanic StrengthFlames of the FirebrandHuntsmaster of the FellsTraitorous BloodArching DragonFurnace WhelpHellriderHound of GrislbrandKrenkoOlivia VoldarenThundermaw hellkiteZealous Conscrpits</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/28506651/Archetype_Red_Deck_Wins_-_RDW?post_id=523410863#523410863</link><description>Goblin ArsonistDevils PlayPillar Of FlameLightning MaulerVolcanic StrengthFlames of the FirebrandHuntsmaster of the FellsTraitorous BloodArching DragonFurnace WhelpHellriderHound of GrislbrandKrenkoOlivia VoldarenThundermaw hellkiteZealous Conscrpits</description><pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2012 21:33:22 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Why so many people say     Vexing Devil                                 isn't that good, to me it's one drop that does 4 dammage, hard to beat that IMO. I'm a beginner so I'd like to understand as I was thinking of getting those for my deck.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/28506651/Archetype_Red_Deck_Wins_-_RDW?post_id=523405487#523405487</link><description>Why so many people say     Vexing Devil                                 isn't that good, to me it's one drop that does 4 dammage, hard to beat that IMO. I'm a beginner so I'd like to understand as I was thinking of getting those for my deck.</description><pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2012 18:43:56 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
