New Posts For Thread: Ok now ban tarmogoyf and dark confidant in Modern please...http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/28286379/Ok_now_ban_tarmogoyf_and_dark_confidant_in_Modern_please...Hello, I saw that you like banning a lot of cards this year.. You ban every decks affordable and now we can't even play your new wonderfull format because tarmogoyf and dark confidant are too good not to play and too expensive. By the way, know thatScrubs lead to banning. Banning leads to stagnation. Stagnation leads to boredom.In all seriousness, though, I don't think there's a single argument for the banning of Goyf that I haven't heard yet, and "It's so expensive" is used way more often thanhttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/28286379/Ok_now_ban_tarmogoyf_and_dark_confidant_in_Modern_please...?post_id=525492213#525492213Scrubs lead to banning. Banning leads to stagnation. Stagnation leads to boredom.In all seriousness, though, I don't think there's a single argument for the banning of Goyf that I haven't heard yet, and "It's so expensive" is used way more often thanFri, 26 Oct 2012 11:40:56 -0500Bob isn't worth bann. His drawback makes you to build aroud him. I experienced several times, that it killed his owner. His ability costs you 7 life during the game, which is quite a lot. He is good but not overpoweredThe Goyf is totally different. Hhttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/28286379/Ok_now_ban_tarmogoyf_and_dark_confidant_in_Modern_please...?post_id=525486099#525486099Bob isn't worth bann. His drawback makes you to build aroud him. I experienced several times, that it killed his owner. His ability costs you 7 life during the game, which is quite a lot. He is good but not overpoweredThe Goyf is totally different. HFri, 26 Oct 2012 08:41:15 -0500Please remember to keep your comments positive, productive, and on topic. Remember we are trying to create a mutually beneficial and productive community for everyone to take part in.At the end of the day we are all in this thing together, and if wehttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/28286379/Ok_now_ban_tarmogoyf_and_dark_confidant_in_Modern_please...?post_id=525475173#525475173Please remember to keep your comments positive, productive, and on topic. Remember we are trying to create a mutually beneficial and productive community for everyone to take part in.At the end of the day we are all in this thing together, and if weThu, 25 Oct 2012 20:20:42 -05001) Who said that? Dark Confidant is has seen, is seeing, and will see play in quite literally every format he is legal in. Including Vintage. Whoever said Dark Confidant wouldn't see play in Modern is in a minority.2) Did this really need a necro?[/qhttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/28286379/Ok_now_ban_tarmogoyf_and_dark_confidant_in_Modern_please...?post_id=525475073#5254750731) Who said that? Dark Confidant is has seen, is seeing, and will see play in quite literally every format he is legal in. Including Vintage. Whoever said Dark Confidant wouldn't see play in Modern is in a minority.2) Did this really need a necro?[/qThu, 25 Oct 2012 20:14:21 -0500Just looking though this thread, I don't think it's great if only a handfull of stratergies are plausible, not everyone is into the meta game, ofc every deck clearly can't be optimised to equal perfection either, but wouldn't it be better to have athttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/28286379/Ok_now_ban_tarmogoyf_and_dark_confidant_in_Modern_please...?post_id=523137545#523137545Just looking though this thread, I don't think it's great if only a handfull of stratergies are plausible, not everyone is into the meta game, ofc every deck clearly can't be optimised to equal perfection either, but wouldn't it be better to have atFri, 17 Aug 2012 20:17:25 -0500