<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: 01/03/2011 Feature: "Designing the Masters"</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/26491845/01032011_Feature:_Designing_the_Masters</link><description>This thread is for discussion of this week's Feature Article, which goes live Thursday morning on magicthegathering.com.</description><item><title>Yeah drafting is how cards get into the system on mtgo.  Nobody cracks packs, not when you can draft and potentially win more 24 hours a day.  So they absolutely need the limited environment to be fun so people will keep doing that.  ME2 is notorious</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/26491845/01032011_Feature:_Designing_the_Masters?post_id=480634245#480634245</link><description>Yeah drafting is how cards get into the system on mtgo.  Nobody cracks packs, not when you can draft and potentially win more 24 hours a day.  So they absolutely need the limited environment to be fun so people will keep doing that.  ME2 is notorious</description><pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 08:52:01 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Draft is the bread and butter of MTGO sales, and so I can see why they want the set to be draftable. That said, I thnk they wasted a lot of time twisting themselves into a knot over it. MED1 was actually supposed to be drafted with Tenth Edition and</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/26491845/01032011_Feature:_Designing_the_Masters?post_id=480507961#480507961</link><description>Draft is the bread and butter of MTGO sales, and so I can see why they want the set to be draftable. That said, I thnk they wasted a lot of time twisting themselves into a knot over it. MED1 was actually supposed to be drafted with Tenth Edition and</description><pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 18:12:56 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Just another vote for paper reprints of some of these cards. There are plenty of commons and uncommons (not to mention budget rares) that the kitchen table/pauper communities would love to see new copies of. You could even reprint them in the new fra</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/26491845/01032011_Feature:_Designing_the_Masters?post_id=480487989#480487989</link><description>Just another vote for paper reprints of some of these cards. There are plenty of commons and uncommons (not to mention budget rares) that the kitchen table/pauper communities would love to see new copies of. You could even reprint them in the new fra</description><pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 15:33:53 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>So, from Mox Opal, it's only going to get worse. That's a pretty bleak outlook.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/26491845/01032011_Feature:_Designing_the_Masters?post_id=480486757#480486757</link><description>So, from Mox Opal, it's only going to get worse. That's a pretty bleak outlook.</description><pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 15:24:30 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>I am probably the last person that should be asking this question, but anyhow.While it is not at all possible to please everyone, is there anyone who would say, "the designers designed the layout of these previously printed cards that I had no other</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/26491845/01032011_Feature:_Designing_the_Masters?post_id=480486173#480486173</link><description>I am probably the last person that should be asking this question, but anyhow.While it is not at all possible to please everyone, is there anyone who would say, "the designers designed the layout of these previously printed cards that I had no other</description><pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 15:19:32 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
