<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: 12/15/2010 Feature: "GDS2 Design Challenge #3: Contestants' Submissions"</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/26456573/12152010_Feature:_GDS2_Design_Challenge_3:_Contestants_Submissions</link><description>This thread is for discussion of this Feature Article, which goes live Wednesday morning on magicthegathering.com.</description><item><title>Better late than never!Mirrred at: community.wizards.com/magicthegathering/...Disclaimer: community.wizards.com/magicthegathering/...Ethan FleischerPenumbriaIn the deep places of the earth, you can spread the light or embrace the darkness.Considering</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/26456573/12152010_Feature:_GDS2_Design_Challenge_3:_Contestants_Submissions?post_id=484372833#484372833</link><description>Better late than never!Mirrred at: community.wizards.com/magicthegathering/...Disclaimer: community.wizards.com/magicthegathering/...Ethan FleischerPenumbriaIn the deep places of the earth, you can spread the light or embrace the darkness.Considering</description><pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 14:55:10 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>You're right. The two biggest regrets I have about my submission are the white Watcher spell (which has an awkward template and is a bit of a bleed) and my use of the word "daring" describe my own actions. I wanted to express that I was stepping outs</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/26456573/12152010_Feature:_GDS2_Design_Challenge_3:_Contestants_Submissions?post_id=478893109#478893109</link><description>You're right. The two biggest regrets I have about my submission are the white Watcher spell (which has an awkward template and is a bit of a bleed) and my use of the word "daring" describe my own actions. I wanted to express that I was stepping outs</description><pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 11:46:20 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Maro already said why they use upkeep triggers. Magic plays better when players can interact. The alternative win cards work better when your opponent has a turn to do something. It also creates vunerability for the alt-win deck. "sheild down" moment</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/26456573/12152010_Feature:_GDS2_Design_Challenge_3:_Contestants_Submissions?post_id=478892801#478892801</link><description>Maro already said why they use upkeep triggers. Magic plays better when players can interact. The alternative win cards work better when your opponent has a turn to do something. It also creates vunerability for the alt-win deck. "sheild down" moment</description><pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 11:43:51 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Something tells me you haven't actually tried any of those cards in a kitchen table. One works as an alternate win card, the other as a self-defeat. That's why one of them is good design, and the other isn't.[/quote]I agree with DrJones.I can appreci</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/26456573/12152010_Feature:_GDS2_Design_Challenge_3:_Contestants_Submissions?post_id=478880265#478880265</link><description>Something tells me you haven't actually tried any of those cards in a kitchen table. One works as an alternate win card, the other as a self-defeat. That's why one of them is good design, and the other isn't.[/quote]I agree with DrJones.I can appreci</description><pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 09:41:41 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Perhaps, but "remove a -1/-1 counter instead" is hardly the global enabler that "discard a card instead" or "sacrifice a land instead" would be. It would really only be relevant in block, which is restrictive enough to let the alternate cost flex its</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/26456573/12152010_Feature:_GDS2_Design_Challenge_3:_Contestants_Submissions?post_id=478867145#478867145</link><description>Perhaps, but "remove a -1/-1 counter instead" is hardly the global enabler that "discard a card instead" or "sacrifice a land instead" would be. It would really only be relevant in block, which is restrictive enough to let the alternate cost flex its</description><pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 07:30:08 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
