<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: 6/22/2010 LI: "Fear's Fetters"</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/25110369/6222010_LI:_Fears_Fetters</link><description>This thread is for discussion of this week's Limited Information, which goes live Tuesday morning on magicthegathering.com.</description><item><title>The only point I would make is that his friend may have been hoping that the opponent was tutoring for the land so he could play the narcolepsy on the invoker the next turn.  Thus playing the lizard forces pushes the opponent even more in that direct</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/25110369/6222010_LI:_Fears_Fetters?post_id=453299745#453299745</link><description>The only point I would make is that his friend may have been hoping that the opponent was tutoring for the land so he could play the narcolepsy on the invoker the next turn.  Thus playing the lizard forces pushes the opponent even more in that direct</description><pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 11:19:37 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Good article with relevant points for newbs, also a nice little "don'tcha think?" exercise for the more experienced [that is, knowing Narcolepsy on Invoker isn't so bad, as his ability is still playable].It's good for specifying WHAT to be scared of,</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/25110369/6222010_LI:_Fears_Fetters?post_id=453257041#453257041</link><description>Good article with relevant points for newbs, also a nice little "don'tcha think?" exercise for the more experienced [that is, knowing Narcolepsy on Invoker isn't so bad, as his ability is still playable].It's good for specifying WHAT to be scared of,</description><pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 03:38:01 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Great article Steve - a 100 times better than last week's. &Acirc;&nbsp;Sadly, all of the articles seem slightly&Acirc;&nbsp;disappointing&Acirc;&nbsp;to me, because I did my math wrong and though M11 spoilers started this week.I know that they've revealed a lot of limited fodder al</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/25110369/6222010_LI:_Fears_Fetters?post_id=453218569#453218569</link><description>Great article Steve - a 100 times better than last week's. &Acirc;&nbsp;Sadly, all of the articles seem slightly&Acirc;&nbsp;disappointing&Acirc;&nbsp;to me, because I did my math wrong and though M11 spoilers started this week.I know that they've revealed a lot of limited fodder al</description><pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 18:17:31 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Yes, in retrospect, I do agree that Lagac Lizard is not a particularly bad play, because you can attack him the next turn and use your Akoum Boulderfoot to put the last point of damage on his Ondu Giant if he blocks your Lizard.  And if he doesn't bl</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/25110369/6222010_LI:_Fears_Fetters?post_id=453213013#453213013</link><description>Yes, in retrospect, I do agree that Lagac Lizard is not a particularly bad play, because you can attack him the next turn and use your Akoum Boulderfoot to put the last point of damage on his Ondu Giant if he blocks your Lizard.  And if he doesn't bl</description><pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 17:32:05 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Nice article. I do have a few issues with it though:1) The central, take-home message should certainly have been clearer.2)&Acirc;&nbsp;The cards in the example make pretty obvious that Steve's friend should have chanced it and played the umbra; [c]Narcolepsy[/</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/25110369/6222010_LI:_Fears_Fetters?post_id=453172233#453172233</link><description>Nice article. I do have a few issues with it though:1) The central, take-home message should certainly have been clearer.2)&Acirc;&nbsp;The cards in the example make pretty obvious that Steve's friend should have chanced it and played the umbra; [c]Narcolepsy[/</description><pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 12:37:52 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
