New Posts For Thread: 6/17/10 Top Decks: New Toyshttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/25065093/61710_Top_Decks:_New_ToysThis thread is for discussion of this week's Top Decks Article, which goes live Thursday morning on magicthegathering.com.Dude, I played T1 and did spend quite a bit of money on single cards. You completely missed the point here. First its not about card prices per se that people are upset, its mostly because these are standard players. There is something wrong when peohttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/25065093/61710_Top_Decks:_New_Toys?post_id=452657653#452657653Dude, I played T1 and did spend quite a bit of money on single cards. You completely missed the point here. First its not about card prices per se that people are upset, its mostly because these are standard players. There is something wrong when peoFri, 18 Jun 2010 15:52:05 -0500this is where you quote multiple high level event t8s with emeria angelsoh wait...I was talking about you trying to say that Emeria Angel was a poor choice without even knowing why it was in the deck.Not sure if you noticed, but Mike Flores publiclyhttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/25065093/61710_Top_Decks:_New_Toys?post_id=452603149#452603149this is where you quote multiple high level event t8s with emeria angelsoh wait...I was talking about you trying to say that Emeria Angel was a poor choice without even knowing why it was in the deck.Not sure if you noticed, but Mike Flores publiclyFri, 18 Jun 2010 09:53:14 -0500I would entirely support banning Jace, but unfortunately I think my motives would be less than pure. I'm sick of the card appearing in every other standard deck list, 3-4 copies, for all the reasons given above. However I think this doesn't fully meehttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/25065093/61710_Top_Decks:_New_Toys?post_id=452586129#452586129I would entirely support banning Jace, but unfortunately I think my motives would be less than pure. I'm sick of the card appearing in every other standard deck list, 3-4 copies, for all the reasons given above. However I think this doesn't fully meeFri, 18 Jun 2010 07:39:34 -0500Dude, I played T1 and did spend quite a bit of money on single cards. You completely missed the point here. First its not about card prices per se that people are upset, its mostly because these are standard players. There is something wrong when peohttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/25065093/61710_Top_Decks:_New_Toys?post_id=452577953#452577953Dude, I played T1 and did spend quite a bit of money on single cards. You completely missed the point here. First its not about card prices per se that people are upset, its mostly because these are standard players. There is something wrong when peoFri, 18 Jun 2010 06:10:07 -0500From the winning decklist it looks like it is about the time that WotC gave Jace the same treatment as Skullclamp got. There were different archetypes back in the days of clamp, and the reason it got banned then was it was used practically in almosthttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/25065093/61710_Top_Decks:_New_Toys?post_id=452576213#452576213From the winning decklist it looks like it is about the time that WotC gave Jace the same treatment as Skullclamp got. There were different archetypes back in the days of clamp, and the reason it got banned then was it was used practically in almostFri, 18 Jun 2010 05:47:01 -0500