New Posts For Thread: 6/09/2010 StF: "Auratouched Magery"http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/24993773/6092010_StF:_Auratouched_MageryThis thread is for discussion of this week's Savor the Flavor, which goes live Wednesday on magicthegathering.com.haha, so he got it wrong?http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/24993773/6092010_StF:_Auratouched_Magery?post_id=451329865#451329865haha, so he got it wrong?Wed, 09 Jun 2010 14:50:33 -0500Right.Methinks the authour is reading into the flavor a bit too much.  Aura's don't become a part of the aura'd.http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/24993773/6092010_StF:_Auratouched_Magery?post_id=451329569#451329569Right.Methinks the authour is reading into the flavor a bit too much.  Aura's don't become a part of the aura'd.Wed, 09 Jun 2010 14:49:00 -0500The author said that [c]Oni Possession[/c] is an aura that you would attach to your opponent's creatures. But it is worded exactly like [c]Recumbent Bliss[/c], so the controller of the aura (you) is the one who must sacrifice a creature. Right?http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/24993773/6092010_StF:_Auratouched_Magery?post_id=451329121#451329121The author said that [c]Oni Possession[/c] is an aura that you would attach to your opponent's creatures. But it is worded exactly like [c]Recumbent Bliss[/c], so the controller of the aura (you) is the one who must sacrifice a creature. Right?Wed, 09 Jun 2010 14:46:13 -0500"And this terminology didn't make 100% explicit that these cards were, in fact, full-fledged enchantments, even though every other card type said explicitly what type they were."http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/24993773/6092010_StF:_Auratouched_Magery?post_id=451315905#451315905"And this terminology didn't make 100% explicit that these cards were, in fact, full-fledged enchantments, even though every other card type said explicitly what type they were."Wed, 09 Jun 2010 13:23:13 -0500I like the concept of magic enchanting magic in Spellweaver Volute's artwork, and that could continue to work so long as the original spell and the enchantment were distinguished clearly enough.More challenging, though, would be to show an enchantmenhttp://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/24993773/6092010_StF:_Auratouched_Magery?post_id=451294277#451294277I like the concept of magic enchanting magic in Spellweaver Volute's artwork, and that could continue to work so long as the original spell and the enchantment were distinguished clearly enough.More challenging, though, would be to show an enchantmenWed, 09 Jun 2010 10:48:30 -0500