<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: 2/17/2010 BoaB: "Equip and Swing!"</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/22429505/2172010_BoaB:_Equip_and_Swing!</link><description>This thread is for discussion of this week's Building on a Budget, which goes live Wednesday morning on magicthegathering.com.</description><item><title>Stoneforge mystic was at 75 cents when this article was written.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/22429505/2172010_BoaB:_Equip_and_Swing!?post_id=391494017#391494017</link><description>Stoneforge mystic was at 75 cents when this article was written.</description><pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 00:07:32 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Hmmmmm 4 stoneforge mystics thats at least $25 throw in the collar and its already over $30.&Acirc;&nbsp; So why is it called building on a budget.&Acirc;&nbsp; Some people love the game, but don't really care to spend more then $20 a week on it, because they live&Acirc;&nbsp;with a</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/22429505/2172010_BoaB:_Equip_and_Swing!?post_id=391483625#391483625</link><description>Hmmmmm 4 stoneforge mystics thats at least $25 throw in the collar and its already over $30.&Acirc;&nbsp; So why is it called building on a budget.&Acirc;&nbsp; Some people love the game, but don't really care to spend more then $20 a week on it, because they live&Acirc;&nbsp;with a</description><pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 22:22:12 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Enjoyable read. Personally, i wouldn't refer to the deck as exceptionally original in any way, but that's just me. The deck itself seems very similar to that of a friend of mine at my local store, except he isn't running any of the lightcasters main,</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/22429505/2172010_BoaB:_Equip_and_Swing!?post_id=391399377#391399377</link><description>Enjoyable read. Personally, i wouldn't refer to the deck as exceptionally original in any way, but that's just me. The deck itself seems very similar to that of a friend of mine at my local store, except he isn't running any of the lightcasters main,</description><pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 09:50:37 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Since we know he played more than two matches maybe he could just list the results of those matches as opposed to writing a detailed review.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/22429505/2172010_BoaB:_Equip_and_Swing!?post_id=390866729#390866729</link><description>Since we know he played more than two matches maybe he could just list the results of those matches as opposed to writing a detailed review.</description><pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 14:51:39 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>To clarify everything:702.14d A permanent with protection can&acirc;&#x80;&#x99;t be equipped by Equipment that have the stated quality or fortified by Fortifications that have the stated quality. Such Equipment or Fortifications become unattached from that permanen</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/22429505/2172010_BoaB:_Equip_and_Swing!?post_id=390825861#390825861</link><description>To clarify everything:702.14d A permanent with protection can&acirc;&#x80;&#x99;t be equipped by Equipment that have the stated quality or fortified by Fortifications that have the stated quality. Such Equipment or Fortifications become unattached from that permanen</description><pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 08:02:03 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
