<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Magic Arcana / Card of the Day / Daily Decks - September, 2009</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/20004769/Magic_Arcana__Card_of_the_Day__Daily_Decks_-_September,_2009</link><description>This thread is for discussion of 's Magic Arcana, Card of the Day, and Daily Decks features for the month of September, 2009.</description><item><title>rofl</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/20004769/Magic_Arcana__Card_of_the_Day__Daily_Decks_-_September,_2009?post_id=359840913#359840913</link><description>rofl</description><pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 11:00:54 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I like flicking cards at people.&Acirc;&nbsp;The old packs contained more cards to flick at people, giving me more enjoyment and resulting in more disgruntled people.So they are clearly better.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/20004769/Magic_Arcana__Card_of_the_Day__Daily_Decks_-_September,_2009?post_id=349481241#349481241</link><description>I like flicking cards at people.&Acirc;&nbsp;The old packs contained more cards to flick at people, giving me more enjoyment and resulting in more disgruntled people.So they are clearly better.</description><pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 13:59:00 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>not being able to something with theme decks that isn't a good idea and that you probably shouldn't do doesn't make theme decks better than intro packs. not even .0001%.</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/20004769/Magic_Arcana__Card_of_the_Day__Daily_Decks_-_September,_2009?post_id=349199501#349199501</link><description>not being able to something with theme decks that isn't a good idea and that you probably shouldn't do doesn't make theme decks better than intro packs. not even .0001%.</description><pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 09:52:31 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I never said it was a big (or rational) problem, but it makes it, say, .01% worse. And I'm not a fan of things being made worse, even infinetismally so. You know, "Never compromise, even in the face of armageddon" and all that philosophy that seems t</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/20004769/Magic_Arcana__Card_of_the_Day__Daily_Decks_-_September,_2009?post_id=349180289#349180289</link><description>I never said it was a big (or rational) problem, but it makes it, say, .01% worse. And I'm not a fan of things being made worse, even infinetismally so. You know, "Never compromise, even in the face of armageddon" and all that philosophy that seems t</description><pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 02:07:14 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>if you're running a 40 card precon with 2 singleton rares and they're running a constructed 60 card deck that's built correctly, the "consistency" of your deck shouldn't be a problem for them. a deck running 4x of each card (and each card is really g</title><link>http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/20004769/Magic_Arcana__Card_of_the_Day__Daily_Decks_-_September,_2009?post_id=349127561#349127561</link><description>if you're running a 40 card precon with 2 singleton rares and they're running a constructed 60 card deck that's built correctly, the "consistency" of your deck shouldn't be a problem for them. a deck running 4x of each card (and each card is really g</description><pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 17:47:24 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
