DrWorm's blog listings. Feed Zend_Feed_Writer 1.10.8 (http://framework.zend.com) http://community.wizards.com/drworm EDH-ADD This is most certainly a deck in progress, as it feels a bit amaturish to me.

[deck=ADD]

General:
1*Kaalia of the Vast

Death from Above:
1*Angelic Arbiter
1*Voice of All
1*Fallen Angel
1*Sunblast Angel
1*Tariel, Reckoner of Souls
1*Aegis Angel
1*Razia, Boros Archangel
1*Akroma, Angle of Fury
1*Angel of Despair
1*Bladewing the Risen
1*Mana-Charged Dragon
1*Kilnmouth Dragon
1*Hellkite Charger
1*Steel Hellkite
1*Bogardan Hellkite
1*Ryusei, the Falling Star
1*Kuro, Pitlord
1*Tombstalker
1*Oni of Wild Places
1*Rune-Scarred Demon
1*Dread Cacodemon

0 Comments - Leave a Comment
]]>
Thu, 04 Aug 2011 12:27:47 -0500 http://community.wizards.com/drworm/blog/2011/08/04/edh-add http://community.wizards.com/drworm/blog/2011/08/04/edh-add This is most certainly a deck in progress, as it feels a bit amaturish to me.

[deck=ADD]

General:
1*Kaalia of the Vast

Death from Above:
1*Angelic Arbiter
1*Voice of All
1*Fallen Angel
1*Sunblast Angel
1*Tariel, Reckoner of Souls
1*Aegis Angel
1*Razia, Boros Archangel
1*Akroma, Angle of Fury
1*Angel of Despair
1*Bladewing the Risen
1*Mana-Charged Dragon
1*Kilnmouth Dragon
1*Hellkite Charger
1*Steel Hellkite
1*Bogardan Hellkite
1*Ryusei, the Falling Star
1*Kuro, Pitlord
1*Tombstalker
1*Oni of Wild Places
1*Rune-Scarred Demon
1*Dread Cacodemon

0 Comments - Leave a Comment
]]>
0
Vampire Control The following is my son's recent Vampire EDH deck.  He uses [c]Vish Kal, Blood Arbiter[/c] and it is a Vampire deck, but it shows how a tribal deck can be tribal themed, but not tribal saturated.  There are plenty of Vampires, but the ones he includes (for the most part) are ones that work towards his theme of supporting Vish Kal as the main win con, and Life Gain as a secondary theme.  He does not (again for the most part) include vampires because they are vampires, but only if they work. 

This deck is VERY effective in 1v1, but has not been tested in multiplayer yet.  On the one hand it has a ton of removal and control to protect it, on the other hand it is an obvious threat, on the third hand you do not want to draw the ire of the deck either.  It will be an interesting experience to play in multiplayer.

General:
[c]Vish Kal, Blood Arbiter[/c]V

Tokens:
[c]Segnir Nosferatu[/c]V
[c]Teysa, Orzhov Scion[/c]
[c]Skeletal Vampire[/c]V

Assorted Vamps:
[c]Vampire Nighthawk[/c]V
[c]Blood Seeker[/c]V*
[c]Segnir Vampire[/c]V

Protection:
[c]Lightning Greaves[/c]
[c]Darksteel Plate[/c]
[c]Argentum Armor[/c]
[c]Champion's Helm[/c]

Creature Boost:
[c]Caged Sun[/c]
[c]Coat of Arms[/c]
[c]Urge to Feed[/c]
[c]Captivating Vampire[/c]V
[c]Blade of the Bloodchief[/c]
[c]Archangel of Strife[/c]
[c]Crescendo of War[/c]
[c]Lashwrithe[/c]

Recurrsion/Tutor:
[c]Diabolic Tutor[/c]
[c]Reanimate[/c]
[c]Karmic Guide[/c]
[c]Living Death[/c]
[c]Stitch Together[/c]
[c]Betrayal of Flesh[/c]

Life Gain:
[c]Sangromancer[/c]V
[c]Proper Burial[/c]
[c]True Conviction[/c]
[c]Kalastria Highborn[/c]V
[c]Congregate[/c]
[c]Felidar Sovereign[/c]
[c]Chancellor of the Dross[/c]*V
[c]Malakir Bloodwitch[/c]V

Control:
[c]Bloodhusk Ritualist[/c]V
[c]Ghostly Prison[/c]
[c]Vampire Hexmage[/c]V
[c]Sword of Feast and Famine[/c]
[c]Scythe Specter[/c]
[c]Chancellor of the Annex[/c]

Removal:
[c]Sheoldred, Whispering One[/c]V
[c]Cruel Edict[/c]
[c]Butcher of Malakir[/c]V
[c]Gatekeeper of Malakir[/c]V
[c]Feast of Blood[/c]
[c]Phyrexian Rebirth[/c]
[c]Journey to Nowhere[/c]
[c]Oblivion Ring[/c]
[c]Revoke Existance[/c]
[c]Austere Command[/c]
[c]Drana, Kalastria Bloodchief[/c]V
[c]Unmake[/c]
[c]False Prophet[/c]
[c]Mageta the Lion[/c]
[c]Gravepact[/c]
[c]Life's Finale[/c]
[c]Oblivion Stone[/c]

Draw:
[c]Gravestorm[/c]
[c]Skullclamp[/c]

Land:
[c]Orzhov Basilica[/c]
[c]Vivid Marsh[/c]
[c]Bojuka Bog[/c]
[c]Command Tower[/c]
[c]Caves of Koilos[/c]
[c]Emeria, the Sky Ruin[/c]
12x [c]Plains[/c]
22x [c]Swamp[/c]

*- These are cards I think should be removed because there are better choices, but this deck wins a lot, so who am I to mess with it.
V- Vampires

0 Comments - Leave a Comment
]]>
Sat, 30 Jul 2011 15:56:15 -0500 http://community.wizards.com/drworm/blog/2011/07/30/vampire_control http://community.wizards.com/drworm/blog/2011/07/30/vampire_control The following is my son's recent Vampire EDH deck.  He uses [c]Vish Kal, Blood Arbiter[/c] and it is a Vampire deck, but it shows how a tribal deck can be tribal themed, but not tribal saturated.  There are plenty of Vampires, but the ones he includes (for the most part) are ones that work towards his theme of supporting Vish Kal as the main win con, and Life Gain as a secondary theme.  He does not (again for the most part) include vampires because they are vampires, but only if they work. 

This deck is VERY effective in 1v1, but has not been tested in multiplayer yet.  On the one hand it has a ton of removal and control to protect it, on the other hand it is an obvious threat, on the third hand you do not want to draw the ire of the deck either.  It will be an interesting experience to play in multiplayer.

General:
[c]Vish Kal, Blood Arbiter[/c]V

Tokens:
[c]Segnir Nosferatu[/c]V
[c]Teysa, Orzhov Scion[/c]
[c]Skeletal Vampire[/c]V

Assorted Vamps:
[c]Vampire Nighthawk[/c]V
[c]Blood Seeker[/c]V*
[c]Segnir Vampire[/c]V

Protection:
[c]Lightning Greaves[/c]
[c]Darksteel Plate[/c]
[c]Argentum Armor[/c]
[c]Champion's Helm[/c]

Creature Boost:
[c]Caged Sun[/c]
[c]Coat of Arms[/c]
[c]Urge to Feed[/c]
[c]Captivating Vampire[/c]V
[c]Blade of the Bloodchief[/c]
[c]Archangel of Strife[/c]
[c]Crescendo of War[/c]
[c]Lashwrithe[/c]

Recurrsion/Tutor:
[c]Diabolic Tutor[/c]
[c]Reanimate[/c]
[c]Karmic Guide[/c]
[c]Living Death[/c]
[c]Stitch Together[/c]
[c]Betrayal of Flesh[/c]

Life Gain:
[c]Sangromancer[/c]V
[c]Proper Burial[/c]
[c]True Conviction[/c]
[c]Kalastria Highborn[/c]V
[c]Congregate[/c]
[c]Felidar Sovereign[/c]
[c]Chancellor of the Dross[/c]*V
[c]Malakir Bloodwitch[/c]V

Control:
[c]Bloodhusk Ritualist[/c]V
[c]Ghostly Prison[/c]
[c]Vampire Hexmage[/c]V
[c]Sword of Feast and Famine[/c]
[c]Scythe Specter[/c]
[c]Chancellor of the Annex[/c]

Removal:
[c]Sheoldred, Whispering One[/c]V
[c]Cruel Edict[/c]
[c]Butcher of Malakir[/c]V
[c]Gatekeeper of Malakir[/c]V
[c]Feast of Blood[/c]
[c]Phyrexian Rebirth[/c]
[c]Journey to Nowhere[/c]
[c]Oblivion Ring[/c]
[c]Revoke Existance[/c]
[c]Austere Command[/c]
[c]Drana, Kalastria Bloodchief[/c]V
[c]Unmake[/c]
[c]False Prophet[/c]
[c]Mageta the Lion[/c]
[c]Gravepact[/c]
[c]Life's Finale[/c]
[c]Oblivion Stone[/c]

Draw:
[c]Gravestorm[/c]
[c]Skullclamp[/c]

Land:
[c]Orzhov Basilica[/c]
[c]Vivid Marsh[/c]
[c]Bojuka Bog[/c]
[c]Command Tower[/c]
[c]Caves of Koilos[/c]
[c]Emeria, the Sky Ruin[/c]
12x [c]Plains[/c]
22x [c]Swamp[/c]

*- These are cards I think should be removed because there are better choices, but this deck wins a lot, so who am I to mess with it.
V- Vampires

0 Comments - Leave a Comment
]]>
0
Common Threads Series: The Battlefeild Setup I play EDH more than anything now, but asside from the command zone everything is pretty much the same no matter what format I play.


Lands are where they are because I tap those more than anything else, also when I declare attackers I tap my creature then advance it towards my opponent so it is easy to know what is attacking and what is not.  If my lands were "above" my creatures I could not easily slide them up.  Artifacts and enchantments are often global objects (or equip that needs to be equipped) so having them off to the side seems the best.  If I have room I try to fan out my graveyard so I know that is in there.

EDIT:  I should add that I firmely believe that card position should be standardized for DCI sanctioned events.  Even if the standard is different from the way I like it, I just feel like it eliminates misunderstandings and lame "mind game" type attitudes- "If my opponent wasn't paying attention to how I tapped my creature and is confused it is his problem for not paying attention".  (just using this as an example)  If DCI sanctioned a "right" way it would be easier to know the game state for both players, and a judge that happens by.

0 Comments - Leave a Comment
]]>
Mon, 25 Jul 2011 16:18:59 -0500 http://community.wizards.com/drworm/blog/2011/07/25/common_threads_series:_the_battlefeild_setup http://community.wizards.com/drworm/blog/2011/07/25/common_threads_series:_the_battlefeild_setup I play EDH more than anything now, but asside from the command zone everything is pretty much the same no matter what format I play.


Lands are where they are because I tap those more than anything else, also when I declare attackers I tap my creature then advance it towards my opponent so it is easy to know what is attacking and what is not.  If my lands were "above" my creatures I could not easily slide them up.  Artifacts and enchantments are often global objects (or equip that needs to be equipped) so having them off to the side seems the best.  If I have room I try to fan out my graveyard so I know that is in there.

EDIT:  I should add that I firmely believe that card position should be standardized for DCI sanctioned events.  Even if the standard is different from the way I like it, I just feel like it eliminates misunderstandings and lame "mind game" type attitudes- "If my opponent wasn't paying attention to how I tapped my creature and is confused it is his problem for not paying attention".  (just using this as an example)  If DCI sanctioned a "right" way it would be easier to know the game state for both players, and a judge that happens by.

0 Comments - Leave a Comment
]]>
0
Common Threads Series: Deck Box When I play, however, I generally bring this-
It is a small aluminum tool box that I found at a hardware store.  I modded it with rows for holding my first 12 EDH decks (sleeved obviously).  I also have a little tray that holds my life counters (poker chips with labels on them), some small d6, and some manner of tokens.  Tokens depend on my mood and I have been known to use: Plastic animals, Official Token cards, dice, and glass beads.  I have used other things, but only in a pinch.

0 Comments - Leave a Comment
]]>
Mon, 25 Jul 2011 15:31:33 -0500 http://community.wizards.com/drworm/blog/2011/07/25/common_threads_series:_deck_box http://community.wizards.com/drworm/blog/2011/07/25/common_threads_series:_deck_box When I play, however, I generally bring this-
It is a small aluminum tool box that I found at a hardware store.  I modded it with rows for holding my first 12 EDH decks (sleeved obviously).  I also have a little tray that holds my life counters (poker chips with labels on them), some small d6, and some manner of tokens.  Tokens depend on my mood and I have been known to use: Plastic animals, Official Token cards, dice, and glass beads.  I have used other things, but only in a pinch.

0 Comments - Leave a Comment
]]>
0
Common Threads Series: Card Storage and Sorting First of all, I should say at the start: "Hello, my name is Gern Blanston and I am addicted to card organizing.

I have organized my collection several times, either because one of my kids has dumped it, or I did not like the way I had organized previously. I have used several systems and storage containers, but the system I use now (binders) is the easiest for me when I am making decks. I can grab the few I need, take them in to the living room, and get busy. It can be a pain putting a lot of cards away, but there are a lot of ways to make this easier.

First of all I have 20, colored-coded, 3" binders (two for each color) with the colors corresponding to the color of cards in them. I also have 3" binders for each other type (artifact+Colorless, gold/multicolored). For each color (or binder as the case may be) I have most of my common and uncommon cards (intermixed) sorted by card type (Instants, Sorcery, Enchantment, Creatures), and then alphabetically. I put up to 4 cards in each pocket, and some cards I use in a lot of decks will have 3-4 pockets. If I have more than 4 of a card, and I am not likely to need multiple playsets of that card I will set them aside to glue proxy's to, or give away to new players.

The exceptions to the above are artifacts (colored and colorless) and colorless non-artifacts. Eldrazi threw my system for a loop and so far I just sort them in with the artifact creatures or artifacts (for colorless instants or sorceries).

Then I have my rare binders. These are two binders that can be zipped closed, with most of my rares not currently in decks and and not from the last two sets, that are simply sorted by color (,multi-color,artifact) then alphabetically. The lands are in another 1.5" zipper binder simply sorted by alphabetical order, with full art lands in the back sorted by color.

The final binders are three more 1.5" zipper binders that I keep my constructed staples (and my proxies that I am likely to need again), and one 2" binder for tha two most current sets. I frequently will go through the staples binders and down-grade cards from constructed staples to make room, putting the removed cards in their corresponding binders. Because I consider these staples I am less likely to trade these, but their frequency of use and sometimes value of the cards included makes in important that I can zip these closed. The Current binder is the only one I have that is sorted by collector's number, and in it there is one pocket designated for each number (with numbers on the pockets), and can hold the last three sets. I did this because I found myself having to update my other binders frequently with the last set, and I do not find organizing my whole collection by collector's number to be all that useful. By having a permanent pocket for each card in the set I never have to do anything more than slide the card in it's spot, and I can tell easily what I need more of, and what I can pass on to others. If I could find a 3" zipper closed binder that I liked I would unclude the entire current block in there, but so far no-go.

I also have a small trade binder, but I don't trade often so most of the time I do not keep it maintained.

Lastly I have a milk crate full of fatpack boxes, a couple of Archive quality photo boxes, and a few deck builders tool kit boxes. The archive boxes have been sectioned off with cardboard in to rows (one box has two rows wide enough for sleeved cards, the other 3 rows unsleeved). All of these are unsorted cards (seperated by color) that I have not put away yet, my overflow non-basic lands, snow covered basics, and basic lands (sorted by art and color).

In addition to the unsorted cards in boxes, I also have my less frequently used proxies, my decks (see Common Threads Series: Deck box for more details), and my tokens and counters. The tokens an counters I sort by color and alphabetically, and I sleeve them. Why do I sleeve worthless tokens? Because then they are less likely to get shuffled in to one of my decks at the end of the game- especially since they are frequently not the same kind of sleeve as the deck.

It was a lot of work organizing them the last time, but I enjoyed it. I would just do it in front of the TV at night and soon everything was in it's place. Now when I build a deck I just grab the binders I need and start building. If I take a deck apart or get new (non-rare) cards they might sit in unsorted, but soon get put away.

0 Comments - Leave a Comment
]]>
Mon, 25 Jul 2011 15:30:21 -0500 http://community.wizards.com/drworm/blog/2011/07/25/common_threads_series:_card_storage_and_sorting http://community.wizards.com/drworm/blog/2011/07/25/common_threads_series:_card_storage_and_sorting First of all, I should say at the start: "Hello, my name is Gern Blanston and I am addicted to card organizing.

I have organized my collection several times, either because one of my kids has dumped it, or I did not like the way I had organized previously. I have used several systems and storage containers, but the system I use now (binders) is the easiest for me when I am making decks. I can grab the few I need, take them in to the living room, and get busy. It can be a pain putting a lot of cards away, but there are a lot of ways to make this easier.

First of all I have 20, colored-coded, 3" binders (two for each color) with the colors corresponding to the color of cards in them. I also have 3" binders for each other type (artifact+Colorless, gold/multicolored). For each color (or binder as the case may be) I have most of my common and uncommon cards (intermixed) sorted by card type (Instants, Sorcery, Enchantment, Creatures), and then alphabetically. I put up to 4 cards in each pocket, and some cards I use in a lot of decks will have 3-4 pockets. If I have more than 4 of a card, and I am not likely to need multiple playsets of that card I will set them aside to glue proxy's to, or give away to new players.

The exceptions to the above are artifacts (colored and colorless) and colorless non-artifacts. Eldrazi threw my system for a loop and so far I just sort them in with the artifact creatures or artifacts (for colorless instants or sorceries).

Then I have my rare binders. These are two binders that can be zipped closed, with most of my rares not currently in decks and and not from the last two sets, that are simply sorted by color (,multi-color,artifact) then alphabetically. The lands are in another 1.5" zipper binder simply sorted by alphabetical order, with full art lands in the back sorted by color.

The final binders are three more 1.5" zipper binders that I keep my constructed staples (and my proxies that I am likely to need again), and one 2" binder for tha two most current sets. I frequently will go through the staples binders and down-grade cards from constructed staples to make room, putting the removed cards in their corresponding binders. Because I consider these staples I am less likely to trade these, but their frequency of use and sometimes value of the cards included makes in important that I can zip these closed. The Current binder is the only one I have that is sorted by collector's number, and in it there is one pocket designated for each number (with numbers on the pockets), and can hold the last three sets. I did this because I found myself having to update my other binders frequently with the last set, and I do not find organizing my whole collection by collector's number to be all that useful. By having a permanent pocket for each card in the set I never have to do anything more than slide the card in it's spot, and I can tell easily what I need more of, and what I can pass on to others. If I could find a 3" zipper closed binder that I liked I would unclude the entire current block in there, but so far no-go.

I also have a small trade binder, but I don't trade often so most of the time I do not keep it maintained.

Lastly I have a milk crate full of fatpack boxes, a couple of Archive quality photo boxes, and a few deck builders tool kit boxes. The archive boxes have been sectioned off with cardboard in to rows (one box has two rows wide enough for sleeved cards, the other 3 rows unsleeved). All of these are unsorted cards (seperated by color) that I have not put away yet, my overflow non-basic lands, snow covered basics, and basic lands (sorted by art and color).

In addition to the unsorted cards in boxes, I also have my less frequently used proxies, my decks (see Common Threads Series: Deck box for more details), and my tokens and counters. The tokens an counters I sort by color and alphabetically, and I sleeve them. Why do I sleeve worthless tokens? Because then they are less likely to get shuffled in to one of my decks at the end of the game- especially since they are frequently not the same kind of sleeve as the deck.

It was a lot of work organizing them the last time, but I enjoyed it. I would just do it in front of the TV at night and soon everything was in it's place. Now when I build a deck I just grab the binders I need and start building. If I take a deck apart or get new (non-rare) cards they might sit in unsorted, but soon get put away.

0 Comments - Leave a Comment
]]>
0